How many people in the US are eligible for and respond to checkpoint inhibitors: An empirical analysis

Alyson Haslam1, Timothée Olivier2, Vinay Prasad1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

PubMed

In 2018, we estimated that eligibility for and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies were 44% and 12%, respectively. Since these estimates were published, there have been additional approvals. We sought to provide updated estimates of the percentage of patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancers in the US who are eligible for and respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Using a cross-sectional analysis (2011-2023) of US Food and Drug Administration approvals (FDA) and deaths reported by the American Cancer Society, we estimated the percentage of patients in the US with advanced or metastatic cancers who are eligible and respond to ICI therapies and the long-term response of ICI drugs. Eleven ICI drugs have been approved for 20 tumor types in the metastatic setting. The estimated eligibility for ICIs increased from 1.54% in 2011 to 56.55% in 2023. The estimated response to ICIs increased from 0.14% in 2011 to 20.13% in 2023. The tumor types with the highest contribution to response and eligibility estimates in 2023 were non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 expression ≤50% and PD-L1 expression >50%. Sixteen drug approvals had long-term progression-free survival (PFS) data available at 3 years follow-up, and 2 had PFS data at 5 years follow-up. Estimated eligibility and response have increased over time, but many people with advanced or metastatic cancers are currently ineligible for ICIs. Only about one-fifth of the patients will respond. Given the wide range of uses, the cost implications of ICIs globally are large.

Related Concept Videos

Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
80
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
131
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
321