Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Focal Cerebral Ischemia Model by Endovascular Suture Occlusion of the Middle Cerebral Artery in the Rat
Published on: February 5, 2011
Prospective evaluation of modified Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale for identifying large vessel
Lingwen Zhang1, Xiaoqing Bu2, Juan Liao3
1Department of Neurology, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease Research, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Objective:
To develop a novel, straightforward diagnostic scale for predicting large vessel occlusion (LVO) and anterior circulation LVO (ALVO) in the emergency setting, evaluating its validity against existing scales.
Methods:
We prospectively enrolled patients with suspected stroke presenting consecutively at the National Comprehensive Stroke Centre's emergency department between February 20, 2022, and November 11, 2022. Emergency physicians assessed each patient using the modified Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale (mCPSSS) and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The study analyzed the mCPSSS and other prevalent stroke scales to evaluate their efficacy in detecting LVO and ALVO, employing receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis and area under the curve (AUC) statistics to assess the scales' sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy.
Results:
A total of 383 patients with suspected stroke were included in this study. The performance in identifying LVO in the emergency setting was greatest for mCPSSS ≥ 2 with a sensitivity of 0.802 and specificity of 0.770, PPV of 0.644, NPV of 0.882, and accuracy of 0.781. mCPSSS ≥ 2 was 0.766 sensitive, 0.733 specific, PPV of 0.564, NPV of 0.886, and accuracy of 0.749 in predicting ALVO. The mCPSSS identified LVO and ALVO with an optimal cut-off value of 2, exhibiting AUC superior to those of other widely used stroke scales, with AUC values of 0.824 for LVO and 0.790 for ALVO.
Conclusion:
The mCPSSS could serve as an effective and straightforward scale for identifying LVOs in emergency settings.
Clinical Trial Registration Information:
https://www.chictr.org.cn/ (ChiCTR2200056776).
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above the...
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

