Prophylactic anticoagulation in children receiving home parenteral nutrition: An international prospective

Aysenur Demirok1, Sjoerd C J Nagelkerke1, Samantha C Gouw2

  • 1Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Insights

Prophylactic anticoagulation did not significantly reduce catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in children receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Optimal catheter care and infection prevention are crucial, as catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) were more common in patients with CRT.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Hematology
  • Clinical Nutrition

Background:

  • Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a significant risk for children requiring home parenteral nutrition (HPN) due to chronic intestinal failure (CIF).
  • Current pediatric HPN guidelines indicate insufficient evidence to support routine prophylactic use of anticoagulation for CRT prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy and safety of prophylactic anticoagulation in preventing CRT among pediatric patients on HPN.
  • To evaluate the association between prophylactic anticoagulation and the incidence of CRT in this population.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, international, multicenter study involving children (0-18 years) on HPN.
  • Patients were divided into prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups, followed for 24 months with annual ultrasonography screening for CRT.
  • Propensity score stratification and logistic regression were employed to analyze the association between prophylactic anticoagulation and CRT, adjusting for covariates.

Main Results:

  • The overall incidence of CRT was 0.17 per 1000 catheter days, with no statistically significant difference between the prophylaxis (11%) and non-prophylaxis (11%) groups (OR 0.64, p=0.60).
  • The incidence rate of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) was 0.34 per 1000 catheter days (n=25).
  • Patients with CRT showed a significantly higher incidence of CRBSI (54%) compared to those without CRT (14%) (p=0.010). Two minor bleeding events occurred in the prophylaxis group.

Conclusions:

  • Prophylactic anticoagulation does not appear to significantly reduce CRT incidence in pediatric HPN patients.
  • The findings highlight the importance of meticulous catheter care and infection control, given the association between CRT and CRBSI.
  • Larger multicenter trials are needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for prophylactic anticoagulation in pediatric HPN.
Abstract