Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

97
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
97
Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

1.3K
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
1.3K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

219
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
219
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cognitive flexibility versus stability via activation-based and weight-based adaptations.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Between structure and flexibility: Testing the limits of human generalization.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Neural and computational evidence for a predictive learning account of the testing effect.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Adaptive learning via BG-thalamo-cortical circuitry.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Manipulating Prior Beliefs Causally Induces Under- and Overconfidence.

Psychological science·2024
Same journal

Auditory perceptual maps in humans and mice share common structures and predict perceptual decisions in discrimination learning.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Cross-cultural evidence for positive control and mind-mindedness as buffers for parental distress.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Why sycophantic LLMs may imperil interactive norms between humans.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Early detection of distinct language development in infants of mothers with severe mental illness using fNIRS.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

Real-time cognitive-affective dynamics of failure feedback in a technology-based learning task.

Communications psychology·2026
Same journal

What 5000 babies can tell us about developing minds and how to study them.

Communications psychology·2026
See all related articles
  1. Home
  3. Predictive Learning As The Basis Of The Testing Effect.
  1. Home
  3. Predictive Learning As The Basis Of The Testing Effect.

Related Experiment Video

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.4K

Predictive learning as the basis of the testing effect.

Haopeng Chen1, Cathy Hauspie2, Kate Ergo3

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. haopeng6688@outlook.com.

Communications Psychology
|February 1, 2025

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The testing effect, where testing improves memory more than studying, is explained by predictive learning. This occurs when the difference between predicted and actual answers (prediction error) during testing enhances learning.

More Related Videos

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

7.9K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.4K
Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

7.9K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • The testing effect is a well-documented phenomenon where retrieval practice enhances long-term retention compared to further study.
  • Existing theories propose fundamental learning principles like Hebbian and predictive learning as underlying mechanisms.
  • Predictive learning emphasizes learning from the discrepancy between predictions and subsequent feedback (prediction error).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of predictive learning in the testing effect.
  • To propose a novel framework where prediction error during testing drives learning.
  • To test this hypothesis using computational modeling and behavioral experiments.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an associative memory network model incorporating Hebbian and predictive learning principles.
  • Designed behavioral experiments with human participants studying or testing English-Swahili word pairs.
  • Collected recognition memory data and fitted 10 different computational models to the behavioral results.

    • Main Results:

    • Behavioral experiments consistently demonstrated robust testing effects when feedback was provided.
    • Model fitting analyses indicated that models incorporating predictive learning were superior in explaining the observed data.
    • Only computational models integrating predictive learning could account for the full scope of the testing effect data.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings strongly suggest that predictive learning, specifically through prediction error, is a key mechanism underlying the testing effect.
    • This research provides a computational and empirical basis for understanding how testing enhances memory.
    • The study highlights the importance of prediction error in associative memory and learning.