Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players' Lunge Performance
Published on: June 11, 2019
Systematic review on badminton injuries: incidence, characteristics and risk factors
Brid Stepper1,2, Anne Hecksteden1,3, Hendrik Stagge2
1Institute of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Objectives:
As a high-intensity intermittent sport with short and repeated rapid accelerations, decelerations and changes of direction, badminton involves high joint and muscle loads. This review aims to identify relevant injury risk characteristics and factors that facilitate developing and implementing badminton-specific injury prevention programmes.
Design:
This systematic review of badminton injuries assessed the risk of bias, injury incidence, mechanism, location, type, severity, and risk factors.
Data Sources:
PubMed, WoS, SURF, EBSCO, Ovid and SPORTDiscus.
Eligibility Criteria:
Only English or German peer-reviewed articles presenting epidemiological data. All age groups, genders and levels of play were represented.
Results:
Examination of 19 studies with male (60%) and female players (41%) at different player levels (age: 10-50 years). The mean injury incidence was between 1 and 4 injuries/1000 hours, whereby the incidence in the studies that were only carried out with elite players tended to be at the upper end. Lower body injuries occurred most frequently (41%-92%), including strains (11%-64%), sprains (10%-61%), tendinopathy (6%-14%) and stress fractures (5%-11%). There was a high proportion of overuse injuries (25%-74%) and a predominance of mild and moderate injuries (73%-100%). The following risk factors can only be cautiously emphasised due to the heterogeneous results: The risk of injury increases with increasing level of play and a history of injury.
Conclusion:
Young players with a history of injury quickly moving to higher competition classes must be targeted with the highest injury prevention priority. Future studies should focus on improving the quality of studies by using comparable data collection methods.

