Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026
Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Near-zero fluoroscopy workflow for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation using a variable loop,
M Borlich1, S Groschke2, J Wietgrefe2
1Heart and Vascular Center, Segeberger Kliniken, Am Kurpark 1, 23795, Bad Segeberg, Germany. martin.borlich@segebergerkliniken.de.
Background:
Catheter ablation is a standard atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, traditionally using radiofrequency (RF) or cryoablation, which carries the risk of damaging nearby structures. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) offers partly tissue-selective energy application with minimal collateral damage. This study evaluated a near-zero fluoroscopy workflow with the novel VARIPULSE™ catheter, combining advanced mapping for optimized PFA delivery and reduced radiation. Here, we investigate the safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of this approach in the first 35 patients treated.
Objective:
This study aimed to assess the procedural characteristics, safety, and acute efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the VARIPULSE™ PFA catheter in patients with AF, while specifically evaluating a near-zero fluoroscopy workflow to minimize radiation exposure during the procedure.
Methods:
Thirty-five consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the VARIPULSE™ PFA catheter. Procedures were conducted under general anesthesia or deep sedation. Key procedural endpoints included acute pulmonary vein isolation, total procedure time, left atrial (LA) dwell time, fluoroscopy time and dose, and safety outcomes, with a focus on assessing the feasibility of a near-zero fluoroscopy workflow.
Results:
Thirty patients underwent near-zero fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation using the novel VARIPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation catheter. Patients had a median age of 70 years and typical cardiovascular comorbidities, with 54% presenting with paroxysmal AF. Thirty-three of 35 patients (94%) had a normal left ventricular systolic function (> 60%). The median CHA2DS2-VA score was 2 (IQR 1-3.75). Sinus rhythm was observed in 66% of cases at procedure start. Median fluoroscopy time was 0.8 min, total median procedure time 53 min, median LA dwell time 38 min, and median fluoroscopy dose 20.4 µGym2. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 100% of cases without radiofrequency touch-up. No major complications occurred.
Conclusion:
The VARIPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation system enables an efficient, nearly fluoroscopy-free atrial fibrillation ablation with a simple, easily integrable workflow in the electrophysiology lab. Complete pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all cases without radiofrequency touch-ups, and the procedure was safe with no major complications. This demonstrates the potential for widespread adoption of this technology and workflow.
