Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Minimally Invasive Thumb-sized Pterional Craniotomy for Surgical Clip Ligation of Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
Published on: August 11, 2015
Management and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Aneurysms: A Patient-Level Systematic Review
Daler Rahimov1, Nayeem Nasher1, Danial Ahmad1
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Insights
Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) with fistulous connections (CAAF) have higher rupture risk but better survival. Management strategies vary, but both surgical and interventional approaches yield similar survival outcomes for CAAs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
- Medical Research
Background:
- Standardized management guidelines for coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are lacking.
- This study quantitatively analyzes existing evidence on CAA management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes and management strategies for CAAs with fistulous connections (CAAF) versus those without (CAAO).
- To provide data-driven insights for guiding CAA treatment.
Main Methods:
- Systematic electronic search of 431 case reports/series on CAA, including 488 patients.
- Extraction and analysis of patient-level data, comparing CAAF and CAO subgroups.
- Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and hazard assessment based on aneurysm characteristics.
Main Results:
- CAAF patients exhibited a higher median aneurysm diameter and significantly increased rupture risk compared to CAAO.
- Angina was a more frequent presenting symptom in CAAO, while surgery was the predominant management for CAAF.
- Despite higher rupture risk, CAAF showed a trend toward more favorable survival, with mortality associated with aneurysm diameter in both groups.
Conclusions:
- CAAF presents a higher rupture risk but potentially better survival than CAAO.
- Management of CAAs should be tailored to the presence or absence of a fistula.
- Both surgical and interventional management strategies for CAAs result in comparable survival rates.
Background:
Data are lacking to guide standardized management of coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs). We sought to analyze the available evidence in a quantitative manner.
Methods:
An electronic search identified 431 case reports or case series on CAA, comprising 488 patients. Patient-level data were extracted. Subgroups of CAA with fistulous connections (CAAF) and CAA without fistulous connections (CAAO) were analyzed separately.
Results:
Fistulous connection was present in 24.0% (117/488) of patients with CAA. Angina was a presenting symptom in 64.7% (301/465), with higher preponderance in the CAAO group [CAAO: 71.1% (249/350) versus CAAF: 45.2% (52/115); P < 0.01]. The median largest aneurysm diameter was higher in the CAAF group [CAAO: 3.0 (1.5-5.0) cm versus CAAF: 5.0 (3.0-7.0) cm; P < 0.01], and rupture was more frequently observed in the CAAF group [CAAO: 3.1% (11/353) versus CAAF: 13.8% (16/116); P < 0.01]. For any given diameter, CAAF had a higher risk of rupture compared with CAAO. Surgery was the most common management strategy, particularly in patients with CAAF [CAAO: 50.9% (189/371) versus CAAF: 75.2% (88/117); P < 0.01]. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a trend toward more favorable survival in CAAF. The hazard of mortality was associated with aneurysm diameter in both subsets but was higher in the CAAO group independent of surgical versus interventional management.
Conclusions:
CAAF appears to have a higher risk of rupture but may be associated with better survival than CAAO. Management for patients with CAA differs based on the presence or absence of a fistula; however, both surgical and interventional modes of management result in similar survival.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management

