Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025
A Unified Methodological Framework for Vestibular Schwannoma Research
Published on: June 20, 2017
Risk analysis of radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: Systematic review and comparative study of 10-year outcomes
Kevin M Guy1, April A Pace2, Derek S Tsang3
1Department of Otolaryngology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Background:
Determine the benefit of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) compared to no treatment for sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) by calculating epidemiologic risk using 10-year data; apply the analysis to VS that have demonstrated linear growth.
Methods:
PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library are systematically reviewed for VS tumor control 10 years after SRS and compared to a historical cohort of untreated VS (primary risk analysis). Subgroups of VS limited by size and observed growth are compared to the untreated cohort (secondary analysis).
Results:
Twenty-four studies of 4079 SRS-treated VS exhibited tumor control in 90.93% (87.0%-100%; SD 4.1%), while 1959 untreated VS exhibited control in 65.24%. SRS reduces the absolute risk (ARR) of tumor progression by 25.7% compared to no treatment. The number needed to treat (NNT) is 4 (3.892, 95% CI: 3.619-4.210). Subgroup analyses of (1) VS with definite linear growth before SRS result in a similar ARR of 29.4% and NNT 4 (3.395, 95% CI: 2.966-3.968), and (2) Koos 1 VS result in lower ARR 18.31% and higher NNT 6 (5.209; 95% CI: 4.018-7.401).
Conclusions:
This "best-available" case-control study of 10-year data reveals that ARR and NNT are similar for VS with and without definite pretreatment linear growth. These comparisons may be applied to CPA diameters less than 2 cm. Results for Koos 1 tumors are different. This analysis quantifies the therapeutic benefit of SRS by comparative risk analysis. The level of evidence on this topic is low.
