Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Detection of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Haematological Malignancy Patients by using Lateral-flow Technology
Published on: March 22, 2012
Candida auris screening of high-risk patients: a descriptive comparison of 2 strategies
Laura Pedersen1, Aldo Barajas-Ochoa1, Kaila Cooper2
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Abstract:
We compared two Candida auris screening strategies in high-risk patients. The positivity rates for point prevalence survey (PPS) and admission screening were similar: 3.9% versus 3.4%, respectively, P = 1.00. Approximately 3% of high-risk patients are colonized, thus there is a need for a universal infection prevention approach for C. auris.
Insights
Two Candida auris screening methods showed similar positivity rates in high-risk patients. Universal infection prevention is needed as about 3% of these patients are colonized with Candida auris.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Microbiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen.
- High-risk patients are susceptible to Candida auris colonization and infection.
- Effective screening strategies are crucial for controlling Candida auris transmission.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of two Candida auris screening strategies.
- To evaluate positivity rates between point prevalence surveys and admission screening.
- To inform infection prevention approaches for Candida auris in healthcare settings.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of positivity rates between point prevalence survey (PPS) and admission screening.
- Analysis of screening data from high-risk patient populations.
- Statistical analysis to determine the significance of observed differences.
Main Results:
- Positivity rates for PPS and admission screening were similar (3.9% vs. 3.4%, P=1.00).
- Approximately 3% of high-risk patients were found to be colonized with Candida auris.
- No statistically significant difference was observed between the two screening methods.
Conclusions:
- Both PPS and admission screening are comparable in identifying Candida auris colonization.
- The consistent colonization rate highlights the need for universal infection prevention measures.
- A comprehensive approach is necessary to manage Candida auris in high-risk patient populations.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...

