Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
Published on: May 10, 2024
An intelligent spam detection framework using fusion of spammer behavior and linguistic
Amna Iqbal1, Muhammad Younas2, Muhammad Kashif Hanif1
1Department of Computer Science, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
Abstract:
The diverse types of fake text generation practices by spammer make spam detection challenging. Existing works use manually designed discrete textual or behavior features, which cannot capture complex global semantics of text and reviews. Some studies use limited features while neglecting other significant features. However, in case of a large number of features set, the selection of all features leads to overfitting the model and expensive computation. The problem statement of this research paper revolves around addressing challenges concerning feature selection and evolving spammer behavior and linguistic features, with the goal of devising an efficient model for spam detection. The primary objective of this endeavor was to identify the most efficacious subset of features and patterns for the task of spam detection. Spammer behavior features and linguistic features often exhibit complex relationships that influence the nature of spam reviews. The unified representation of features is another challenging task in spam detection. Various deep learning approaches have been proposed for spam detection and classification but these methods are specialized in extracting the features but lack to capture feature dependencies effectively with other features but there is a lack of comprehensive models that integrate linguistic and behavioral features to improve the accuracy of spam detection. The proposed spam detection framework SD-FSL-CLSTM used the fusion of spammer behavior features and linguistic features which automatically detect and classify the spam reviews. Fusion enables the proposed model to automatically learn the interactions between the features during the training process, allowing it to capture complex relationships and make predictions based on both types of features. SD-FSL-CLSTM framework apparently shows the promising result by obtaining a minimum accuracy 97%.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Mass Analyzers: Overview

