Implementation of a "Same Night" Appendectomy (SNAppy) Discharge Protocol: A Quality Improvement Initiative
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Joshua K Ramjist1, Benjamin Carr2, Kimberly Aitken Menezes3
1Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Purpose:
Appendectomy is curative for appendicitis and prolonged hospitalization is unnecessary for un-complicated disease. We implemented a protocol to expedite discharge of patients post-appendectomy.
Methods:
Using multiple plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles, the protocol functions in three phases of care. Pre-operatively, expectations for discharge are established, antibiotics and acetaminophen are administered. Intra-operatively, a foley catheter is avoided and the maximum dose of local analgesic, routine skin prophylaxis, ondansetron and ketorolac are administered. Post-operatively, patients with stable vital signs, pain controlled, tolerating liquids and able to mobilize are discharged. The primary outcome measured was length of stay (LOS) post-procedure. Counterbalance measures were unexpected return to the emergency department (ED) and in-patient bed utilization. Impact of PDSA cycles was quantified using statistical process control charts and Mann Whitney U test. All statistical tests were 2-sided and P value ≤ 0.05 deemed to be statistically significant.
Results:
A total of 332 patients were identified over a 2-year period, 147 pre-protocol implementation, 185 afterwards. The median age was 9 years old (IQR:6-11), procedure duration 40 min (IQR 29-53). The median post-op LOS pre-protocol was 11.2 h (IQR: 7.1-16.2) compared to 1.5 h (IQR: 1.1-4.2) after implementation (P < 0.00001). There were 10 returns to the ED pre-protocol (6.8 %) and 17 after implementation (9.2 %), (p = 0.65). Pre-protocol, no patients were discharged directly from the OR compared to 68 % after implementation. There was no difference in ED LOS (median 9:03 vs 9:14, p < 0.48).
Conclusion:
Implementation of the SNAppy protocol significantly reduced the post-operative LOS and inpatient bed utilization without increasing ED returns.
Level Of Evidence:
III.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Discharge Summary Forms
Here's a detailed look at the key components and guidelines for preparing a discharge summary:
Planning Nursing Care I
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...

