Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
Published on: March 27, 2019
Socio-spatial inequalities in alcohol outlet availability: Evidence from register data in 15 urban areas in Québec,
Stephanie Sersli1, José Arturo Jasso Chávez2, Sienna Longo3
1Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Département des Sciences de la Santé Communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Background:
Alcohol spatial availability is linked with public health issues, with disadvantaged populations experiencing disproportionate harm. This study examined the association between alcohol spatial availability and area-level measures of disadvantage and sociodemographic characteristics in Québec, Canada.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using 2021 liquor register and census data across 15 Québec urban areas. Measures included outlet counts within 800 m buffers and a spatial access index. Multilevel regression models assessed associations with composite measures of area-level disadvantage and single-item measures of area-level sociodemographic characteristics.
Findings:
On average, Québec areas exhibited higher offsite than onsite alcohol outlet availability. We found a J-shaped relationship between offsite alcohol availability and material disadvantage, with the most disadvantaged areas having 25 % more offsite outlets (95 % CI: 1.14-1.37) than the least disadvantaged. Conversely, onsite availability was 24 % lower (95 % CI: 0.67-0.87) in the most materially disadvantaged areas. Social disadvantage was associated with higher availability of both offsite and onsite outlets, with the highest socially disadvantaged areas having nearly 15 times as many onsite outlets (IRR 14.77, 95 % CI: 13.05-16.72) compared to the least disadvantaged. Higher population density and higher percentages of young adults, new immigrants, and recent movers were also associated with higher availability.
Conclusion:
Alcohol availability differed by outlet type and disadvantage dimension. Offsite outlets were more common in both highly and minimally materially disadvantaged areas, while onsite outlets were more common in minimally disadvantaged areas. Socially disadvantaged areas had higher availability of both types of outlets. These findings suggest the need for targeted policies to reduce alcohol outlet availability, particularly in socially disadvantaged areas.
More Related Videos
08:45Modeling Alcohol Consumption in Rodents Using Two-Bottle Choice Home Cage Drinking and Microstructural Analysis
Published on: November 8, 2024
05:40The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans
Published on: April 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Factorial Design
Levels of Use of a GIS
Drug Distribution: Volume of Distribution
Selected Data About Geographic Locations
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data