Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

2-Methacryloyloxyethyl Phosphorylcholine Polymer Treatment of Complete Dentures to Inhibit Denture Plaque Deposition
Published on: December 26, 2016
Chewing with Co-Cr or PEEK denture frameworks: A randomized crossover clinical study
Pedro Henrique Bastos de Oliveira1, Guilherme Fantini Ferreira1, Lorena Tavares Gama1
1Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Cobalt-chromium removable partial dentures (RPDs) demonstrated superior masticatory performance and patient satisfaction compared to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) RPDs. PEEK frameworks were linked to reduced function and satisfaction in this comparative study.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Prosthodontics
- Biomaterials Engineering
Background:
- Removable partial dentures (RPDs) are crucial for restoring function in patients with partial edentulism.
- Cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are common materials for RPD frameworks, each with distinct properties.
- Comparative data on masticatory function and patient satisfaction between Co-Cr and PEEK frameworks are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare masticatory performance and patient satisfaction between RPDs with cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and injected polyetheretherketone (PEEK) frameworks.
- To evaluate the clinical efficacy of PEEK versus Co-Cr frameworks in RPDs.
Main Methods:
- A crossover study design involving 12 volunteers with Kennedy Class I mandibular edentulism.
- Masticatory performance was assessed using sieve analysis (X50) and maximum bite force (MBF).
- Patient satisfaction was measured using a visual analog scale, with data analyzed via independent-samples t-tests.
Main Results:
- RPDs with Co-Cr frameworks showed significantly better masticatory performance (lower X50 values) than PEEK frameworks (p=0.007).
- Patient satisfaction regarding prosthesis stability (p=0.02) and chewing ability (p<0.001) was significantly higher with Co-Cr RPDs.
- Maximum bite force did not significantly differ between the two framework types.
Conclusions:
- Injected PEEK frameworks for RPDs were associated with reduced masticatory performance compared to Co-Cr frameworks.
- Patient satisfaction with RPDs was lower when using PEEK frameworks relative to Co-Cr.
- Co-Cr frameworks appear to be a more favorable choice for RPDs concerning function and patient acceptance.
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Oral Cavity
Teeth: The teeth are the hardest structures in our bodies. Humans have two sets of teeth throughout their lifetime: deciduous (baby) teeth and permanent teeth. Each tooth consists of several parts: the crown (visible part), the root (embedded in the jaw), enamel (hard outer...
Deglutition
Swallowing can be divided into three stages: the voluntary phase, the pharyngeal phase, and the esophageal phase. Although the...
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

