Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

Murine Ileocolic Bowel Resection with Primary Anastomosis
Published on: October 29, 2014
Surgical Treatment of Perforated Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation in Extremely Low
Ayah Alzamrooni1, Lisandro Luques2, Pattamon Sutthatarn3
1Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Introduction:
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) lead to significant morbidity and mortality in extreme-low birth weight (ELBW) infants. This study examined surgical management and outcomes for these conditions.
Methods:
A retrospective chart review of ELBW infants (birthweight <1000 g) who had laparotomy for NEC or SIP managed with primary anastomosis (PA) and stoma formation (SF) at a single high-volume center from 2000 to 2022 was performed. Patient data included demographics, pre-operative status, operative findings, post-operative complications, and outcomes at discharge and at 12 months. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney test.
Results:
Of 132 patients included, 40 underwent PA and 92 underwent SF. SF patients had lower birth weights and older post-gestational age at surgery. SF patients exhibited higher pre-operative CRP and lower platelet counts. No significant differences were found in intra-operative findings. Post-operatively, SF patients had higher conjugated bilirubin levels, longer hospital stays, and longer times to full enteral feeds. Mortality rates were similar between groups. Nutritional outcomes at 12 months did not significantly differ. Micropreemies (weight <750 g at surgery) had higher mortality and more comorbidities, but no significant differences were observed between PA and SF management cohorts.
Conclusion:
PA is a safe alternative to SF for managing NEC and SIP in ELBW infants with shorter hospital stays and faster progression to full feeds but the severity of pre-operative illness may influence surgical decision. Further studies are needed to refine patient selection criteria and optimize surgical outcomes.
Type Of Study:
Clinical Research.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.
More Related Videos
07:51The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage
Published on: November 4, 2010
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD: