Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Hepatitis C Infection.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Genotype-by-sex interaction analyses for alcohol use disorder across biobanks.

Alcohol, clinical & experimental research·2025
Same author

The relationship of smoking and unhealthy alcohol use to HIV care retention and viral suppression: findings from a multisite cohort study.

AIDS (London, England)·2025
Same author

Comparison of 2 electronic health record data extraction methods for laboratory tests used in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study Index.

JAMIA open·2025
Same author

Adaptation of Risk Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Without Alcohol Measures.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Cannabis Use Disorder Among People With and Without HIV.

Journal of addiction medicine·2025
Same journal

PROTEUS Trial the Day After: Practice Changing or Premature Escalation?

European urology oncology·2026
Same journal

Overall Survival Benefit from Metformin in High-volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer in STAMPEDE Signals an Opportunity for Metabolically-targeted Therapies in Prostate Cancer.

European urology oncology·2026
Same journal

Dynamic Changes in Tumor Burden in Patients Undergoing PSMA RLT.

European urology oncology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic Implications of Personalized Circulating Tumor DNA Testing in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin ± Pembrolizumab.

European urology oncology·2026
Same journal

PROTEUS: A Practice-changing Trial, but Are We Ready to Embrace Perioperative Apalutamide for All High-risk Patients?

European urology oncology·2026
Same journal

Pembrolizumab After Nephrectomy for High-risk Renal Cell Carcinoma: Real-world Data from a National Early Access Program Registry.

European urology oncology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.7K

Comparative Performance of Machine Learning Models in Reducing Unnecessary Targeted Prostate Biopsies.

Fuyao Chen1, Roxana Esmaili2, Ghazal Khajir3

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University New Haven CT USA; Medical Scientist Training Program, Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT USA.

European Urology Oncology
|February 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models can predict prostate cancer severity, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies by over 13%. This approach aids in personalized risk assessment and treatment decisions for patients.

Keywords:
Machine learningMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingProstate Imaging-Reporting and Data SystemProstate cancerProstate-specific antigen densityUnnecessary biopsies

More Related Videos

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

21.4K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.7K
Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

21.4K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Conventional prostate cancer diagnosis via core needle biopsy presents challenges, including diagnostic uncertainty and potential complications.
  • There is a growing need for advanced risk assessment methods that integrate clinical and imaging data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of machine learning (ML) models in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
  • To determine if ML models can reduce the rate of unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 1884 patients who underwent prostate MRI and biopsy was performed.
  • Twelve ML models were developed and validated using clinical data (age, PSA, imaging scores, volumes) to predict csPCa (Gleason grade group ≥2).
  • Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis.

Main Results:

  • The top-performing ML model demonstrated a potential reduction in biopsies by 13.07% with a 1.91% false-negative rate.
  • Model performance remained consistent across different academic centers.
  • The study's limitations include a small number of participating centers and lack of detailed clinical data.

Conclusions:

  • ML-enhanced clinical models effectively predict csPCa using standard clinical data, offering a generalizable approach.
  • These models facilitate personalized risk assessment, support clinical decision-making, and enhance workflow efficiency in prostate cancer diagnosis.
  • The integration of ML can lead to more tailored patient management and improved healthcare outcomes.