Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2026

12:00
Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization
Published on: November 19, 2014
12.8K
Impact of EEG Reference Schemes on Event-Related Potential Outcomes: A Corollary Discharge Study Using a Talk/Listen
Subham Samantaray1,2, Nishant Goyal3, Muralidharan Kesavan4
1Department of Psychiatry, Central Institute of Psychiatry (CIP), Ranchi, India. samantasubham@gmail.com.
Brain Topography
|February 12, 2025
Summary
Choosing the right EEG reference impacts event-related potential (ERP) studies. Common Average Reference (CAR) and Reference Electrode Standardization Technique (REST) are recommended for Talk/Listen ERP paradigms for more objective results.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Auditory Neuroscience
- Speech-Auditory System Research
Background:
- Event-related potential (ERP) studies are crucial for understanding the speech-auditory system.
- The Talk/Listen ERP paradigm non-invasively explores the corollary discharge phenomenon.
- EEG reference schema selection significantly influences ERP study outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of different EEG reference schemas on ERPs in the Talk/Listen paradigm.
- To compare linked mastoids (LM), common average reference (CAR), and reference electrode standardization technique (REST).
- To determine the most objective and reliable reference for speech-auditory system research.
Main Methods:
- Statistical analysis (ANOVA) of N1 ERP amplitudes.
- Statistical parametric scalp mapping (SPSM) to visualize activity.
- Source localization techniques to identify neural origins.
Main Results:
- Significant main effects of reference and experimental condition on N1 ERP amplitude.
- LM reference showed pronounced frontocentral activity.
- CAR and REST references revealed frontocentral and occipitotemporal activity, with source analysis supporting their objectivity.
Conclusions:
- EEG reference choice critically affects N1 ERPs in Talk/Listen paradigms.
- CAR and REST references provide more objective and reliable results compared to LM.
- CAR and REST are recommended for future Talk/Listen ERP studies.

