Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
What makes a 'good' decision with artificial intelligence? A grounded theory study in paediatric care
Melissa D McCradden1,2,3, Kelly Thai2, Azadeh Assadi4,5
1The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada melissa.mccradden@adelaide.edu.au.
Developing a framework for clinical decision-making with machine learning (ML) models requires considering evidence, patient factors, and model performance. This study provides an actionable guide to support clinicians using AI tools effectively.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Decision-Making
- Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Clinical decisions increasingly involve patient-level data and advanced analytics.
- Integrating machine learning (ML) models into clinical practice necessitates a structured approach for safe and effective use.
- Existing frameworks may not fully address the complexities of ML-driven patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a comprehensive framework for good clinical decision-making when using machine learning (ML) models for interventional, patient-level decisions.
- To provide clinicians with an actionable guide to navigate the integration of ML insights into patient care.
- To ensure ethical and medicolegal standards are maintained when employing AI in healthcare.
Main Methods:
- Grounded theory qualitative interview study with 16 healthcare professionals and an ML specialist.
- Semi-structured interviews simulated intensive care unit handovers with hypothetical patient cases and ML model visualizations.
- Framework development involved member checks and patient consultations for refinement.
Main Results:
- A framework was developed, grounded in medicolegal and ethical standards, for incorporating ML model inference into clinical decisions.
- Key decision-making factors include patient evidence, applicability of knowledge, patient/family/local context, model details, and model's representation of patient data.
- Participants exhibited automation bias, with some deferring to ML predictions and others prioritizing their medical knowledge; consistent desire for local performance data was noted.
Conclusions:
- Effective clinical decision-making with AI tools necessitates multi-domain reflection, balancing ML insights with clinical expertise.
- An actionable framework and question guide are provided to support clinicians in making sound decisions using AI.
- This work facilitates the responsible and ethical integration of ML into patient-level clinical practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Reason and Intuition
Ethical Dilemmas II
Critical Thinking II
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Heuristics
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...

