Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing a Disposable Dosator for Preclinical Testing of Dry Powder Inhalers in Small Animal Models
Published on: August 18, 2023
In-vitro Evaluation of Solution Pressurised Metered Dose Inhaler Sprays with Low-GWP Propellants
Daniel J Duke1, Lingzhe Rao2, Benjamin Myatt3
1Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, 3168, Victoria, Australia. daniel.duke@monash.edu.
The transition to low Global Warming Potential (GWP) propellants in metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) impacts drug delivery. HFO1234ze(E) shows comparable performance to HFA134a, while HFA152a alters plume characteristics, suggesting formulation and device modifications for bioequivalence.
Area of Science:
- Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Inhalation Technology
- Environmental Science
Background:
- Pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) are transitioning from high Global Warming Potential (GWP) propellants like HFA134a to low-GWP alternatives such as HFA152a and HFO1234ze(E).
- This shift presents challenges in maintaining consistent product performance and in-vitro bioequivalence due to altered propellant physicochemical properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of low-GWP propellants (HFA152a, HFO1234ze(E)) on pMDI performance compared to HFA134a.
- To evaluate aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) and plume characteristics using equivalent pMDI hardware and formulations.
Main Methods:
- Utilized aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) measurements, laser diffraction, and high-speed imaging.
- Compared HFA134a, HFA152a, and HFO1234ze(E) solution formulations of beclomethasone dipropionate.
- Investigated propellant-only placebos, cosolvent-free solutions, and ethanol solutions (8% and 15% w/w).
Main Results:
- HFA152a formulations showed increased drug deposition and less stable, repeatable plumes compared to HFA134a.
- HFO1234ze(E) formulations exhibited APSD performance comparable to HFA134a, with slower plume spread.
- The addition of ethanol moderated differences between propellants, influencing plume characteristics.
Conclusions:
- Plume stability and shot-to-shot repeatability are key factors influencing formulation differences, especially ex-mouthpiece.
- Modifications to actuator orifice and mouthpiece geometries may improve in-vitro bioequivalence for low-GWP pMDIs.
- Formulation and device design adjustments can manage performance differences, providing benchmark data for future low-GWP pMDI development.
Related Concept Videos
Inhaled Medications
Pipe Flowrate Measurement: Problem Solving

