Prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary

Martín Negreira-Caamaño1, Felipe Díez-Delhoyo1, Pedro Cepas-Guillén2

  • 1Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

Insights

New-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFl) in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) patients significantly increases in-hospital and one-year complication risks. Prior AF/AFl did not show this independent association.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Medicine
  • Internal Medicine

Background:

  • Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFl) are common arrhythmias complicating non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS).
  • Understanding the prognostic impact of AF/AFl in NSTEACS is crucial for patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the prognostic significance of new-onset (de novo) and pre-existing atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFl) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS).

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, multicenter registry (IMPACT-TIMING-GO) of patients with NSTEACS undergoing invasive management.
  • Patients categorized by presence of prior or de novo AF/AFl.
  • Assessment of in-hospital composite endpoint (death, renal failure, ventricular arrhythmias, delirium, new infarction, mechanical complications, major bleeding) and 1-year composite endpoint (death, cardiovascular admissions, major bleeding).

Main Results:

  • 1020 patients included; 7.7% had prior AF/AFl, 3.6% developed de novo AF/AFl.
  • Patients with AF/AFl were older with higher comorbidity; de novo AF/AFl indicated greater clinical severity.
  • De novo AF/AFl independently predicted higher in-hospital complications (OR 5.12) and 1-year adverse events (HR 1.95), unlike prior AF/AFl.

Conclusions:

  • New-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFl) is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in NSTEACS patients.
  • This association holds for both in-hospital complications and long-term adverse events.
  • Prior AF/AFl did not demonstrate an independent association with these adverse outcomes in this cohort.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Disturbances in Heart Rhythm01:28

Disturbances in Heart Rhythm

Arrhythmia or dysrhythmia refers to an abnormal heart rhythm caused by a defect in the heart's conduction system. It can cause the heart to beat irregularly, too quickly, or too slowly, leading to symptoms like chest pain, shortness of breath, and fainting. Factors such as stress, caffeine, alcohol, nicotine, cocaine, certain drugs, congenital defects, diseases, and electrolyte abnormalities can trigger arrhythmias.
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow...
870
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers01:24

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers

Adrenergic stimulation generally impacts cardiac rate and rhythm. Specifically, stimulation of the β-adrenoceptors triggers an increase in intracellular calcium ion influx and pacemaker currents, which may cause arrhythmias. Catecholamines like adrenaline also demonstrate β2-adrenoceptor-mediated hypokalemia, impacting cardiac action potential and disrupting the normal cardiac rhythm. Class II antiarrhythmic drugs are β-adrenoceptor antagonists or β-blockers, which...
703
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers01:20

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers

Class IV antiarrhythmic drugs, such as verapamil and diltiazem, block calcium channels. They primarily affect the heart, slowing the conduction in calcium-dependent tissues like the SA and AV nodes. These drugs manage reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and reduce ventricular rate in atrial flutter/fibrillation.
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
761