Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025
Controlled Cortical Impact Model for Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: August 5, 2014
Acceptance and commitment therapy for mild traumatic brain injury (ACTion-mTBI): a quasiexperimental feasibility
Josh Faulkner1, Devin Prouty2, Lucy Devlin2
1Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand josh.faulkner@vuw.ac.nz.
Objectives:
This study aimed to determine the feasibility of recruiting, implementing and delivering an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) (ACTion-mTBI) within a multidisciplinary outpatient mTBI rehabilitation services. The study also aimed to conduct a preliminary investigation of group differences between ACTion-mTBI and an equivalent cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention on various outcome measures and psychological treatment targets.
Design:
A two-arm quasiexperimental feasibility study.
Setting:
Five mTBI rehabilitation clinics throughout New Zealand.
Intervention:
Psychologists working in mTBI rehabilitation clinics throughout New Zealand were trained to deliver ACTion-mTBI or CBT. Eligible participants were assigned to either of these interventions based on the psychologist available at the clinic they were referred to. ACTion-mTBI is a five sessions intervention that incorporates all six components of the ACT model. The CBT intervention is an equivalent intervention and incorporating all four components of the CBT model. Both interventions are adapted for an mTBI context.
Primary Outcome Measures:
The primary outcomes were related to the feasibility of ACTion-mTBI. This included recruitment, retention and treatment adherence of participants, study procedure and fidelity of treatment delivery.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
To explore group differences between ACTion-mTBI and CBT on functional disability, postconcussion symptoms, mental health, valued living and psychological flexibility.
Results:
The intervention proved feasible to implement with community-based mTBI rehabilitation services. Attrition rates were comparable between the two psychological interventions and fidelity to the treatments was high. At post-treatment, when covarying pretreatment scores, ACTion-mTBI had a significantly greater improvement in functional disability than CBT (moderate effect). ACTion-mTBI also had a significantly greater reduction in postconcussion symptoms, anxiety and stress. Promisingly, significant improvements in psychological flexibility was also found post-treatment. There were no group differences on depressive symptoms and valued living.
Conclusion:
We conclude that a full clinical trial of ACTion-mTBI for individuals with mTBI is feasible and warranted.
Trial Registration Number:
ACTRN1262100059482.
