Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
PGSXplorer: an integrated nextflow pipeline for comprehensive quality control and polygenic score model development
Tutku Yaraş1,2, Yavuz Oktay1,2,3, Gökhan Karakülah1,2
1İzmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, İzmir, Turkey.
Abstract:
The rapid development of next-generation sequencing technologies and genomic data sharing initiatives during the post-Human Genome Project-era has catalyzed major advances in individualized medicine research. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have become a cornerstone of efforts towards understanding the genetic basis of complex diseases, leading to the development of polygenic scores (PGS). Despite their immense potential, the scarcity of standardized PGS development pipelines limits widespread adoption of PGS. Herein, we introduce PGSXplorer, a comprehensive Nextflow DSL2 pipeline that enables quality control of genomic data and automates the phasing, imputation, and construction of PGS models using reference GWAS data. PGSXplorer integrates various PGS development tools such as PLINK, PRSice-2, LD-Pred2, Lassosum2, MegaPRS, SBayesR-C, PRS-CSx and MUSSEL, improving the generalizability of PGS through multi-origin data integration. Tested with synthetic datasets, our fully Docker-encapsulated tool has demonstrated scalability and effectiveness for both single- and multi-population analyses. Continuously updated as an open-source tool, PGSXplorer is freely available with user tutorials at https://github.com/tutkuyaras/PGSXplorer, making it a valuable resource for advancing precision medicine in genetic research.
Related Concept Videos
Flow Table Test
Concrete is placed within a truncated cone mold that is 8 inches high with an 8-inch base diameter and a 5-inch top diameter. The...
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....

