Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

A Portal Vein Injection Model to Study Liver Metastasis of Breast Cancer
Published on: December 26, 2016
Causal effects of blood cells on breast cancer: Evidence from bidirectional Mendelian randomization combined with
1Department of Oncology, Anhui Zhongke Gengjiu Hospital, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Recent studies suggest blood cells influence breast cancer, but no Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have confirmed a causal relationship between specific blood cell phenotypes and breast cancer. MR analysis of blood cell phenotypes used breast cancer data from Finngen R11, UKB, and open genome-wide association study databases. Meta-analyzed inverse variance weighted results were adjusted for multiple comparisons. The reverse relationship was also explored. MR and meta-analysis identified significant associations between specific blood cell phenotypes and breast cancer: neutrophil perturbation response (side fluorescence standard deviation of neutrophil 4 in response to alhydrogel perturbation): odds ratio (OR) = 0.967, P = .0009; neutrophil perturbation response (forward scatter median of neutrophil 4 in response to Pam3CSK4 perturbation): OR = 0.972, P = .031; white blood cell perturbation response (side scatter coefficient of variation of WBC 2 in response to nigericin perturbation): OR = 0.972, P = .031; white blood cell perturbation response (forward scatter coefficient of variation of WBC in response to Pam3CSK4 perturbation): OR = 1.042, P = 8.15 × 10-5. And there was no reverse result. Neutrophil perturbation response (side fluorescence standard deviation of neutrophil 4 in response to alhydrogel perturbation) and white blood cell perturbation response (side scatter coefficient of variation of WBC 2 in response to nigericin perturbation) are protective factors for breast cancer. Conversely, neutrophil perturbation response (forward scatter median of neutrophil 4 in response to Pam3CSK4 perturbation) and white blood cell perturbation response (forward scatter coefficient of variation of WBC in response to Pam3CSK4 perturbation) are risk factors for breast cancer.
Recent studies suggest blood cells influence breast cancer, but no Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have confirmed a causal relationship between specific blood cell phenotypes and breast cancer. MR analysis of blood cell phenotypes used breast cancer data from Finngen R11, UKB, and open genome-wide association study databases. Meta-analyzed inverse variance weighted results were adjusted for multiple comparisons. The reverse relationship was also explored. MR and meta-analysis identified significant associations between specific blood cell phenotypes and breast cancer: neutrophil perturbation response (side fluorescence standard deviation of neutrophil 4 in response to alhydrogel perturbation): odds ratio (OR) = 0.967, P = .0009; neutrophil perturbation response (forward scatter median of neutrophil 4 in response to Pam3CSK4 perturbation): OR = 0.972, P = .031; white blood cell perturbation response (side scatter coefficient of variation of WBC 2 in response to nigericin perturbation): OR = 0.972, P = .031; white blood cell perturbation response (forward scatter coefficient of variation of WBC in response to Pam3CSK4 perturbation): OR = 1.042, P = 8.15 × 10-5. And there was no reverse result. Neutrophil perturbation response (side fluorescence standard deviation of neutrophil 4 in response to alhydrogel perturbation) and white blood cell perturbation response (side scatter coefficient of variation of WBC 2 in response to nigericin perturbation) are protective factors for breast cancer. Conversely, neutrophil perturbation response (forward scatter median of neutrophil 4 in response to Pam3CSK4 perturbation) and white blood cell perturbation response (forward scatter coefficient of variation of WBC in response to Pam3CSK4 perturbation) are risk factors for breast cancer.
More Related Videos
08:15gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair
Published on: October 6, 2014
08:53Identifying the Effects of BRCA1 Mutations on Homologous Recombination using Cells that Express Endogenous Wild-type BRCA1
Published on: February 17, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Metastasis
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition
The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition or EMT is a developmental process commonly observed in wound healing, embryogenesis, and cancer metastasis. EMT is induced by transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) or receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) ligands, which further...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Intracellular Signaling Affects Focal Adhesions
Some...
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...