Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Using a Cyclic Ion Mobility Spectrometer for Tandem Ion Mobility Experiments
Published on: January 20, 2022
Determination of Collisional Cross Section Using Microscale High-Field Asymmetric Waveform ion Mobility
Kristina Krasnova1, Colin S Creaser1, James C Reynolds1
1Centre for Analytical Science, Department of Chemistry, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Rationale:
Collisional cross sections (CCS) are an important characteristic of gas-phase ions that are measured using ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IMS). Typically, CCS measurements are performed with drift-tube IMS or travelling-wave IMS. However. in a high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility (FAIMS) device, ion heating effects make CCS determination more challenging. This research explores whether CCS can be predicted with microscale FAIMS by using known CCS standards.
Methods:
An Owlstone ultraFAIMS microscale FAIMS spectrometer was coupled to an Orbitrap Exactive mass spectrometer. Two different CCS standard mixtures (tetraalkylammonium halides [TAAHs] and poly-DL-alanine oligomers) were used to evaluate the system's potential to determine CCS. Test peptide bradykinin acetate and substance P were used to evaluate CCS determination accuracy for singly and doubly charged peptide species using external calibration with a series of poly-DL-alanine peptides for +1, +2 charge states.
Results:
Calibrations with excellent correlation coefficients (R2 = 0.99) for both TAAHs and poly-DL-alanine were obtained. Good accuracy of determination was achieved for bradykinin [M + 2H]2+ with a ± 0.5% difference between experimental and published CCS at a dispersion field (DF) strength of 250 Td; the model proved less accurate for bradykinin [M + H]+ (±1.4% at 240 Td). The accuracy of determination for the [M + H]+ and [M + 2H]2+ ions of substance P was within ± 5% and ± 3% at 250 Td, respectively, while at higher DF values, accuracy decreased to approximately 5%.
Conclusions:
Distinct relationships were observed between CCS and transmission CF with both calibrants. Optimum accuracy was obtained at DF 240-260 Td. At lower DF, accuracy is reduced by insufficient resolution of analyte ions from solvent cluster adducts, while at higher DF values, poor transmission becomes a factor. Nevertheless, these data suggest microscale FAIMS can conduct CCS measurements with reasonable accuracy when the compound being measured has similar structural features to the CCS standards used.
More Related Videos
08:56Detection of Regulated Ergot Alkaloids in Food Matrices by Liquid Chromatography-Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Published on: November 22, 2024
16:40T-wave Ion Mobility-mass Spectrometry: Basic Experimental Procedures for Protein Complex Analysis
Published on: July 31, 2010
Related Concept Videos
Mass Analyzers: Common Types
Mass Analyzers: Overview
Inductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry (ICP–MS): Overview
Mass Spectrometers
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Secondary fragmentations occur in the interaction cell and can be induced by various factors. Fragmentation induced by collision with inert gases, such as N2, Ar, He, etc., is called collision-induced...
Electrospray Ionization (ESI) Mass Spectrometry
ESI utilizes electrical energy to transfer ions from the liquid phase of the sample into the...