Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reinforcement Schedules

Reinforcement Schedules

Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Correction: Learned switch readiness via concurrent activation of task sets: Evidence from task specificity and memory load.

Memory & cognition·2024

Same author

Learned switch readiness via concurrent activation of task sets: Evidence from task specificity and memory load.

Memory & cognition·2024

Same author

Concurrent expectation and experience-based metacontrol: EEG insights and the role of working memory capacity.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2024

Same author

Nurses' Psychological Trauma and Cognitive Control in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

SAGE open nursing·2023

Same author

Task foreknowledge swallows item-specific but not list-wide control learning effects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2022

Same author

Independent subsequent memory effects of conflict resolution and response inhibition.

Psychological research·2021

Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

Random rewards reduce task-switch costs.

Chiu Yu-Chin¹, Corey Allen Nack¹

¹Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance

|February 18, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Random rewards can decrease task switching costs, improving efficiency. This occurs because random rewards, unrelated to performance, slow down responses on both switch and repeat trials, effectively reducing the difference between them.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience

Background:

Task switching is cognitively demanding, involving disengaging from a previous task set and engaging a new one.
Reducing switch costs is vital for enhancing productivity in multitasking environments.
Mechanisms for reducing switch costs are not fully understood, hindering effective interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the impact of noncontingent, or random, rewards on task switch costs.
To determine if random rewards can reduce the cognitive effort associated with task switching.

Main Methods:

A cued task-switching paradigm was employed across four experiments.
Participants received random, noncontingent rewards on some trials.
Switch costs were measured by comparing performance on switch trials versus repeat trials.

Main Results:

Random rewards consistently led to smaller switch costs compared to a no-reward condition.
This reduction was attributed to slowed responses following random reward delivery on both switch and repeat trials.
Reward contingency was crucial; performance-contingent rewards did not yield the same effect.

Conclusions:

Random rewards offer a novel method for potentially reducing task switch costs.
The observed effect is linked to a general slowing post-reward, rather than a specific improvement in task reconfiguration.
Unexpected reward value, not just unexpected events, appears critical for modulating switch costs.