Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development01:30

Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development

21
Social-emotional experiences and cultural influences play significant roles in shaping gender development. During middle childhood, from ages 6 to 11, peer groups become dominant in reinforcing gender norms. Children in this age group often align with same-gender peer groups, which actively encourage behaviors that conform to traditional gender roles. For instance, boys may be discouraged from engaging in activities perceived as feminine, reinforcing culturally dictated norms about masculinity...
21
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

40.0K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.0K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

49.6K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
49.6K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

39.7K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.7K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

89.9K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
89.9K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

38.8K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early sociomoral reasoning encompasses more than interpersonal relationships.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Overexpression of an Alfalfa Gene, <i>MsCKX5</i>, Confers Cold Tolerance in Transgenic <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>.

Genes·2026
Same author

Zn-based seed priming enhances drought resistance during germination of <i>Lespedeza potaninii</i>: physiological and transcriptomic insights.

PeerJ·2026
Same author

Early Childhood Behavioral and Social-Emotional Development Among Asian Indian, Filipino, and Korean Families in the United States: A Pilot Study.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Toddlers expect ingroup loyalty to override personal preferences when outgroups are present.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Children's Numerical Estimation Is Biased by Male Informants More Than Female Informants.

Developmental science·2026
Same journal

The frequency of childhood gender-nonconforming behavior in a nationally representative sample.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Linking childhood adversity and daily hassles to adolescent sleep behaviors: Diurnal cortisol as a mediating pathway.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Infants' expectations about caregivers' comforting behavior and associations with maternal depressive symptoms at 6, 9, and 12 months.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Nonsymbolic ratio and fraction magnitude processing predict fraction knowledge in early grades.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

The growing influence of the parental monitoring-peer affiliation pathway in early adolescence.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Employing a cohort-sequential design spanning 30 years to understand trajectories of maturity fears.

Developmental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2025

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

15.3K

Children selectively amend structural inequalities.

Radhika Santhanagopalan1, Lin Bian1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Chicago.

Developmental Psychology
|February 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Children can amend structural inequalities, selectively redistributing resources based on type. Younger children moved items, while older children aimed for equality, showing an early capacity for fairness.

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.5K
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2025

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

15.3K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.5K
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Social Justice Studies
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Structural inequalities involve historical and ongoing group privilege.
  • Understanding children's responses to inequality is crucial for social development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate children's propensity to amend structural inequalities.
  • To examine how children reallocate resources in the context of pre-existing disparities.

Main Methods:

  • A resource reallocation task with 120 U.S. children (aged 5-12).
  • Children encountered novel groups with historical advantages/disadvantages and unequal resource distribution.
  • Resources included basic, public, luxury, and opportunity goods.

Main Results:

  • Children generally amended inequalities, with older children favoring equal distribution.
  • Resource reallocation was selective: luxury goods continued to favor the advantaged group.
  • Basic goods were reallocated towards equality; public and opportunity goods showed mixed results.

Conclusions:

  • Children demonstrate an emerging capacity to reason about and selectively amend structural inequalities.
  • Age and parental political beliefs influence children's strategies for addressing inequality.