Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Monitoring Hippo Signaling Pathway Activity Using a Luciferase-based Large Tumor Suppressor LATS Biosensor
Published on: September 13, 2018
Cooperation between the Hippo and MAPK pathway activation drives acquired resistance to TEAD inhibition
Sayantanee Paul1, Thijs J Hagenbeek1, Julien Tremblay2
1Department of Discovery Oncology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract:
TEAD (transcriptional enhanced associate domain) transcription factors (TEAD1-4) serve as the primary effectors of the Hippo signaling pathway in various cancers. Targeted therapy leads to the emergence of resistance and the underlying mechanism of resistance to TEAD inhibition in cancers is less characterized. We uncover that upregulation of the AP-1 (activator protein-1) transcription factors, along with restored YAP (yes-associated protein) and TEAD activity, drives resistance to GNE-7883, a pan-TEAD inhibitor. Acute GNE-7883 treatment abrogates YAP-TEAD binding and attenuates FOSL1 (FOS like 1) activity. TEAD inhibitor resistant cells restore YAP and TEAD chromatin occupancy, acquire additional FOSL1 binding and exhibit increased MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway activity. FOSL1 is required for the chromatin binding of YAP and TEAD. This study describes a clinically relevant interplay between the Hippo and MAPK pathway and highlights the key role of MAPK pathway inhibitors in mitigating resistance to TEAD inhibition in Hippo pathway dependent cancers.
Insights
Resistance to TEAD inhibitors in cancer emerges due to increased AP-1 (activator protein-1) activity and restored YAP (yes-associated protein)-TEAD binding. MAPK pathway inhibitors may overcome this resistance in Hippo pathway-dependent cancers.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Signaling
Background:
- TEAD (transcriptional enhanced associate domain) transcription factors are key effectors of the Hippo pathway in cancer.
- Resistance to targeted therapies, including TEAD inhibitors, is a significant clinical challenge.
- Mechanisms of resistance to TEAD inhibition are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the mechanisms driving resistance to TEAD inhibition.
- To explore the interplay between the Hippo and MAPK pathways in cancer drug resistance.
- To identify potential strategies for overcoming TEAD inhibitor resistance.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a pan-TEAD inhibitor (GNE-7883) in cancer models.
- Assessed YAP-TEAD binding and transcriptional activity.
- Analyzed chromatin occupancy and pathway activity (MAPK, AP-1).
- Investigated the role of FOSL1 in TEAD inhibitor resistance.
Main Results:
- Upregulation of AP-1 (activator protein-1) transcription factors and restored YAP (yes-associated protein)-TEAD activity drive resistance to GNE-7883.
- Resistant cells show restored YAP and TEAD chromatin binding and increased MAPK pathway activity.
- FOSL1 is essential for YAP and TEAD chromatin binding and contributes to resistance.
Conclusions:
- A clinically relevant interplay exists between the Hippo and MAPK pathways in the context of TEAD inhibitor resistance.
- Restored AP-1 activity and enhanced MAPK signaling are key mechanisms of resistance.
- MAPK pathway inhibitors show promise in mitigating resistance to TEAD inhibition in relevant cancers.
Related Concept Videos
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway
MAPK Signaling Cascades
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Hedgehog Signaling Pathway

