Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum
Published on: March 12, 2018
A Bench Model of Asynchrony in 6 Ventilators Equipped With Waveform-Guided Options
Isabella Maria Bianchi1, Eric Arisi2, Marco Pozzi2
1Dr Bianchi is affiliated with Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Papa Giovanni XXXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy; and Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, Unit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
New ventilator software using waveform analysis can improve patient-ventilator synchronization, especially for obstructive respiratory conditions. However, caution is advised for restrictive respiratory profiles, as some ventilators showed worsening synchronization.
Area of Science:
- Mechanical ventilation
- Respiratory mechanics
- Patient-ventilator interaction
Background:
- Patient-ventilator asynchrony is a common issue in pressure support ventilation.
- Waveform-guided algorithms aim to improve triggering and cycling by detecting respiratory activity.
- This study evaluates waveform-guided software on six mechanical ventilators.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the synchronization performance of six mechanical ventilators with waveform-guided software.
- To compare automated triggering and cycling against standard settings.
- To evaluate performance across different simulated respiratory mechanics and efforts.
Main Methods:
- Bench study comparing standard and waveform-guided settings on six ventilators (Hamilton G5, C6; IMT bellavista1000; Mindray SV300; Philips Respironics V200, V60).
- Simulated various respiratory mechanics, assistance levels, and patient efforts.
- Tested ventilators with default settings and waveform-guided automation (except V60).
Main Results:
- Automated settings improved triggering in obstructive profiles for B1000, G5, C6, V200.
- Automated settings reduced delayed cycling in obstructive profiles for B1000, G5, C6, V200.
- Asynchrony index (AI) decreased with automated settings in obstructive profiles for B1000, G5, C6, V200.
- Worsening cycling and increased AI were observed in restrictive profiles for some ventilators (B1000, V200).
Conclusions:
- Waveform-based algorithms show potential for enhancing patient-ventilator synchronization.
- Automation is most beneficial in simulated obstructive respiratory conditions.
- Careful consideration is needed for patients with restrictive respiratory profiles due to potential worsening of synchronization.
Related Concept Videos
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:

