Evaluating Modern Implicit Bias Training in the Urology Workforce.

Area of Science:

• Medical Education
• Urology
• Healthcare Bias

Background:

• Implicit bias can negatively affect patient care and provider decision-making.
• Increased focus on bias training aims to improve provider awareness and mitigate disparities.
• Data on the prevalence and effectiveness of bias training in urology is currently lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

• To examine the frequency, modality, and perceived effectiveness of bias training among urology providers.
• To identify current practices and provider satisfaction with existing bias education programs.

Main Methods:

• A nationwide survey was distributed to urology providers via the Society of Academic Urology (SAU) database and social media.
• The anonymous survey assessed exposure to bias training, its content, sponsorship, and perceived impact.
• Data from 84 respondents, including physicians, residents, and advanced practice providers, were analyzed.

Main Results:

• A high percentage of urology providers (67%) reported mandatory bias training, primarily delivered through online courses (75%).
• Only 8% of training was sponsored by urology departments, and just 44% of providers found the training impactful.
• Topics like ageism, ableism, and religious diversity were less frequently covered than race and gender.

Conclusions:

• Bias training in urology is widespread but often implemented through low-satisfaction online modules.
• Current training modalities lack engagement and may not adequately address diverse bias topics.
• Future research should explore more effective and meaningful approaches to bias education in urology to enhance patient care.