Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
The Diagnostic Yield of Investigating Developmental Regression in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Kirsten Furley1,2,3, Audrey Teo4, Katrina Williams4,5,6,7
1Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Kirsten.Furley1@monash.edu.
Insights
Diagnostic investigations for children with developmental regression yield the most results when neurological or epileptic symptoms are present. Genetic/genomic testing shows a high diagnostic yield, informing future research for a standardized approach.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Developmental regression in children presents a diagnostic challenge.
- Identifying the underlying cause is crucial for effective management and intervention.
- Current investigative approaches vary, lacking a standardized protocol.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and evaluate the diagnostic yield of investigations for children experiencing developmental regression.
- To compare the diagnostic yield across different clinical presentations and types of investigations.
- To identify which investigations are most effective in diagnosing the causes of developmental regression.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane) was conducted.
- Included studies reported diagnostic yield for children with developmental regression.
- Random effects meta-analyses were performed using R software with the meta package.
Main Results:
- The overall diagnostic yield varied significantly by presentation and investigation type.
- Children with neurological or epileptic symptoms showed the highest diagnostic yield (68%).
- Genetic/genomic investigations yielded 70% compared to metabolic (28%), neurophysiological (13%), and neuroimaging (6%).
Conclusions:
- Investigations for children with developmental regression and neurological or epileptic symptoms offer the highest diagnostic yield.
- Genetic/genomic investigations are highly effective in diagnosing developmental regression.
- While clinically meaningful, results are limited by small sample sizes, necessitating further research for statistical significance and a unified investigative strategy.
Abstract:
This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic yield of investigations requested for children with developmental regression. Online databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane were searched to identify published records that reported a diagnostic yield for children with developmental regression. Random effects meta-analyses were performed using R software with meta package. Our search identified 11,283 published records, of which 347 were assessed for eligibility, and 15 (596 children) were included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis assessed the diagnostic yield for investigating children with different presentations and developmental regression. Diagnostic yield results were 68% for children with neurological symptoms (two records, six children, 95%CI 32-100) and children with epileptic symptoms (two records, 56 children, 95%CI 15-100); 40% for children with neurodevelopmental delay (six records, 294 children, 95%CI 3-78); 9% for autistic children (three records, 138 children, 95%CI 0-26). Pooled analysis could not be completed for metabolic (one record, 29 children) or genetic presentations (one record, 73 children). The diagnostic yield for genetic/genomic investigations (six records, 142 children, 95%CI, 47-92) was 70%, compared with 28% for metabolic (five records, 286 children, 95%CI 0-64), 13% for neurophysiological (two records, 127 children, 95%CI 0-39) and 6% for neuroimaging (two records, 41 children, 95%CI 0-20). Investigations for children with developmental regression and neurological or epileptic symptoms resulted in the highest diagnostic yield. These results are clinically meaningful and will inform future research to advance towards an agreed investigative approach yet lack statistical significance due to small samples.
More Related Videos
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...