Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Isaac Núñez1, Martín Lajous2

  • 1Dirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. Ciudad de México, México. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, EUA.. isaac.nunezs@incmnsz.mx.

Salud Publica De Mexico
|February 20, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Cognitive Health in Older Adults: Rush Memory and Aging Project.

The American journal of geriatric psychiatry. Open science, education, and practice·2026
Same author

Mexican Teachers' Cohort Cognitive Study: A pilot of home-based assessments.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Reclone: a global research community building equitable access to reagents.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer in Mexico City: A microsimulation modeling study.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same author

Concordance between nutritional cohorts and randomized trials: biological confirmation or statistical consequence? A re-analysis of Stadelmaier et al.

BMC medicine·2026
Same author

Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Lifestyle Recommendations on Early- and Later-Onset Breast Cancer Risk in Mexican Women.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same journal

Glucose control among women with gestational diabetes and early offspring's growth.

Salud publica de Mexico·2026
Same journal

Economic impact of timely diagnosis and early referral in comprehensive cancer care in Mexico: the DERIVA strategy.

Salud publica de Mexico·2026
Same journal

Salud publica de Mexico·2026
Same journal

Salud publica de Mexico·2026
Same journal

Salud publica de Mexico·2026
Same journal

Salud publica de Mexico·2026
See all related articles

Observational studies are crucial for causal inference when randomized controlled trials are unavailable. The target trial emulation framework minimizes bias in observational studies, yielding more reliable results.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Research Methods

Context:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for causal inference but are not always feasible.
  • Observational studies are frequently used but susceptible to various biases.
  • There is a need for methods to enhance the causal inference from observational data.

Purpose:

  • To introduce and explain the target trial emulation framework for improving causal inference from observational studies.
  • To outline the steps involved in emulating a target pragmatic clinical trial using observational data.
  • To discuss the advantages and limitations of this approach.

Summary:

  • The target trial emulation framework involves defining key components of a pragmatic clinical trial protocol (eligibility, treatments, assignment, follow-up, outcomes, contrasts, analysis).

Related Experiment Videos

  • These components are then adapted to available observational data to closely emulate the target trial.
  • This method aims to reduce bias and increase the reliability of causal estimates from observational studies.

    • Impact:

    • Provides a structured approach to strengthen causal inference from observational data.
    • Enhances the validity and interpretability of findings from real-world evidence.
    • Offers a valuable alternative for research questions where RCTs are impractical or unethical.