Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
Post-stroke changes in brain structure and function can both influence acute upper limb function and subsequent
Catharina Zich1, Nick S Ward2, Nina Forss3
1Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
None:
Improving outcomes after stroke depends on understanding both the causes of initial function/impairment and the mechanisms of recovery. Recovery in patients with initially low function/high impairment is variable, suggesting the factors relating to initial function/impairment are different to the factors important for subsequent recovery. Here we aimed to determine the contribution of altered brain structure and function to initial severity and subsequent recovery of the upper limb post-stroke. The Nine-Hole Peg Test was recorded in week 1 and one-month post-stroke and used to divide 36 stroke patients (18 females, age: M = 66.56 years) into those with high/low initial function and high/low subsequent recovery. We determined differences in week 1 brain structure (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) and function (Magnetoencephalography, tactile stimulation) between high/low patients for both initial function and subsequent recovery. Lastly, we examined the relative contribution of changes in brain structure and function to recovery in patients with low levels of initial function. Low initial function and low subsequent recovery are related to lower sensorimotor β power and greater lesion-induced disconnection of contralateral [ipsilesional] white-matter motor projection connections. Moreover, differences in intra-hemispheric connectivity (structural and functional) are unique to initial motor function, while differences in inter-hemispheric connectivity (structural and functional) are unique to subsequent motor recovery. Function-related and recovery-related differences in brain function and structure after stroke are related, yet not identical. Separating out the factors that contribute to each process is key to identifying potential therapeutic targets for improving outcomes.
More Related Videos
04:43Author Spotlight: Advancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Patients with Right Hemisphere Damage Using Assisted Active Exercise
Published on: February 9, 2024
05:28Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024