Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Child somatic growth and neurodevelopment: effects of pregnancy lifestyle intervention
Kristina Geyer1, Roxana Raab1, Monika Spies1
1Institute of Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.
Insights
An antenatal lifestyle intervention did not impact children's growth or neurodevelopment by age five. While some weight category shifts occurred, the intervention showed no long-term benefits for child health outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Maternal and child health
- Public health interventions
- Developmental pediatrics
Background:
- Maternal health behaviors significantly influence offspring's long-term health and obesity risk.
- Antenatal interventions aim to improve maternal health, potentially impacting child development.
- Understanding the lasting effects of such interventions is crucial for public health strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term effects of a comprehensive antenatal lifestyle intervention on somatic growth and neurodevelopment in preschool-aged children.
- To assess the intervention's impact on anthropometric measures (weight, height, BMI) and neurodevelopmental outcomes up to age five.
- To determine if a large-scale, real-world antenatal lifestyle program influences child obesity risk.
Main Methods:
- A cluster-randomized trial (GeliS) followed children born to mothers receiving usual care (control group) or lifestyle counseling (intervention group).
- Anthropometric data and neurodevelopmental assessments using the Ages-and-Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) were collected from children at ages four and five.
- Data from 1,403 children were analyzed to compare outcomes between the intervention and control groups.
Main Results:
- The antenatal lifestyle intervention showed no significant effect on children's weight, height, head circumference, BMI, or related z-scores at ages four and five.
- While underweight proportions decreased in the intervention group, overweight and obesity proportions were higher compared to the control group.
- Neurodevelopmental scores (ASQ) were comparable between children in the intervention and control groups, indicating no discernible impact on cognitive or developmental milestones.
Conclusions:
- The antenatal lifestyle intervention did not yield meaningful long-term improvements in child somatic growth or neurodevelopment up to age five.
- The study found no sustained impact on children's anthropometry or their risk of developing overweight or obesity.
- Personalized antenatal interventions addressing individual risk profiles may be necessary to achieve significant and sustainable effects on child development and obesity prevention.
Objective:
Maternal health behavior influences offspring health and obesity risk. This study examined the long-term effects of an antenatal lifestyle intervention on somatic growth and neurodevelopment of preschool-aged children.
Methods:
We followed children born to women in the cluster-randomized GeliS trial who received usual care (CG) or lifestyle counseling (IG). Anthropometrics and neurodevelopment data for children aged 4 and 5 were collected from routine health examinations and the Ages-and-Stages Questionnaire (ASQ).
Results:
Of 2 286 women initially enrolled, 1 403 reported on their child's development. The intervention had no effect on weight, height, head circumference, BMI, or percentiles and z-scores at ages 4 and 5. In IG compared to CG, the proportion of children with underweight was lower (4 years: 7.8% vs. 10.9%; 5 years: 8.1% vs. 8.9%), while overweight (4 years: 6.5% vs. 4.2%; 5 years: 5.1% vs. 3.4%) and obesity proportions (4 years: 1.0% vs. 1.1%; 5 years: 2.7% vs. 1.6%) were higher. IG children were more likely to fall into a higher weight category at 4 (p = 0.017) and 5 years (p = 0.075). ASQ scores were similar across both groups.
Conclusion:
Despite slight weight differences, the pregnancy lifestyle intervention had no meaningful impact on child somatic growth or neurodevelopment up to age 5.
Impact:
This comprehensive antenatal lifestyle intervention, executed as a large-scale real-world effectiveness trial, did not demonstrate any long-term effect on children's anthropometry or their risk of overweight or obesity up to 5 years of age. No discernible intervention effects were observed concerning children's neurodevelopment outcomes. Personalized antenatal interventions targeting the individual risk profiles of pregnant women may be needed to substantially modify lifestyle behaviors and achieve sustainable impacts on child development and obesity risk.
More Related Videos
05:44Author Spotlight: Collecting the Brain and Serum from the Same Mice Fetus to Study Brain Tumor Development
Published on: May 17, 2024
06:39Using a Murine Model of Psychosocial Stress in Pregnancy as a Translationally Relevant Paradigm for Psychiatric Disorders in Mothers and Infants
Published on: June 13, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Teratogenicity
Introduction to Stress and Lifestyle
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....