Assessing guideline adherence and child abuse evaluation in infants with fractures: a retrospective quality control

Liliane Raess1, Georg Staubli1,2, Michelle Seiler1

  • 1Pediatric Emergency Department and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Swiss Medical Weekly
|February 21, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Guideline adherence for infant fractures was low at 39%, with outpatient care showing particular deficits. Increased child protection team involvement highlights a positive but incomplete impact of the new guideline.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Child Abuse and Neglect
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • A guideline was implemented to standardize the assessment of infant fractures.
  • The study aimed to evaluate adherence to this guideline and its impact on clinical management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess overall adherence to the infant fracture guideline.
  • To evaluate changes in clinical management, including child protection team involvement and skeletal survey rates.
  • To identify variations in adherence based on age and care setting (inpatient vs. outpatient).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective, single-centre quality control study.
  • Inclusion of infants (<12 months) diagnosed with fractures between February 2021 and August 2022.
  • Exclusion of children with prior bone disease or parental non-consent.

Main Results:

  • Overall guideline adherence was 39%.
  • Deviations often involved missing paediatrician or family doctor consultations.
  • Inpatient care (53%) showed higher adherence than outpatient care (26%).
  • Child protection team involvement doubled post-implementation (54%).

Conclusions:

  • Poor overall adherence necessitates ongoing clinician training on child abuse differentials.
  • While child protection team involvement increased, further improvement is needed.
  • Outpatient care requires focused attention to improve guideline adherence.
Abstract