Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

Measurement of the Rheology of Crude Oil in Equilibrium with CO2 at Reservoir Conditions
Published on: June 6, 2017
Prediction of Poisson's ratio for a petroleum engineering application: Machine learning methods
Fahd Saeed Alakbari1, Syed Mohammad Mahmood2,3, Mohammed Abdalla Ayoub4
1Centre of Advanced Process Safety (CAPS), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia.
Abstract:
Static Poisson's ratio (νs) is an essential property used in petroleum calculations, namely fracture pressure (FP). The νs is often determined in the laboratory; however, due to time and cost constraints, quicker and cheaper alternatives are sought, such as data-driven models. However, existing methods lack the accuracy needed for critical applications, necessitating the need to explore more accurate methods. In addition, the previous studies used limited datasets and they do not show the relationships between the inputs and output. Therefore, this study developed a reliable model to predict the νs accurately using the nineteen most common learning methods. The proposed models were created based on a large data of 1691 datasets from different countries. The best-performing model of the nineteen models was selected and further enhanced using various approaches such as trend analysis to improve the model's performance and robustness as some models show high accuracy but show incorrect relationships between the inputs and output because the machine learning model only built based on the data and do not consider the physical behavior of the model. The proposed Gaussian process regression (GPR) model was also compared with published models. After the proposed GPR model was developed, the FP was determined based on the proposed GPR νs model and the previous νs models to evaluate their accuracy on the FP determinations. The best approach out of the published and proposed methods was GPR with a coefficient of determination (R2) and average-absolute-percentage-relative-error (AAPRE) of 0.95 and 2.73%. The GPR model showed proper trends for all inputs. The cross-plotting and group error analyses also confirmed that the proposed GPR approach had high precision and surpassed other methods within all practical ranges. The GPR model decreased the residual error of FP from 87% to 26%. It is believed that such a significant improvement in the accuracy of the GPR model will have a significant effect on realistic FP determination.
More Related Videos
12:18Pore-scale Imaging and Characterization of Hydrocarbon Reservoir Rock Wettability at Subsurface Conditions Using X-ray Microtomography
Published on: October 21, 2018
08:38Microfluidic Devices for Characterizing Pore-scale Event Processes in Porous Media for Oil Recovery Applications
Published on: January 16, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Poisson's Ratio
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Poisson Probability Distribution
The...
Design Example: Flow of Oil Through Circular Pipes
Major Losses in Pipes
Fluid flow can be classified as laminar or turbulent, primarily based on the Reynolds number. This dimensionless number reflects the relative influence of inertial to...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis