Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

Using a Real-Time Locating System to Measure Walking Activity Associated with Wandering Behaviors Among Institutionalized Older Adults
Published on: February 8, 2019
The Most Significant Change: An Evaluation of Predictive Performance Measures in Nursing Homes
Yvonne Wells1, Jo-Anne Rayner2, Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh2
1Lincoln Centre for Research on Ageing, Australian Institute for Primary Care & Ageing (AIPCA), La Trobe University, Melbourne Campus, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Rationale:
Due to their frailty, older people living in nursing homes are at risk of harm if the care provided is not evidence-based and high quality. The performance measures routinely collected to measure quality care in public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia, are currently acute care focused and collected 'after the fact', so there is a need for predictive performance measures that identify circumstances that reflect poor-quality care that will cause harm to residents.
Aims And Objectives:
To evaluate the readiness of public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia to introduce predictive performance measures in aged care.
Methods:
A qualitative descriptive design was used to evaluate the introduction of eight predictive performance measures in six geographically diverse public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia. After implementing the performance measures interviews with staff were undertaken which were used to create 18 most significant change stories. The stories were workshopped by key stakeholders, to detect subtle changes in nursing home staff behaviours and clinical practice.
Results:
In the workshop, using the most significant change methodology six themes from the stories, each with sub-themes were identified which reflect the preparedness of nursing homes for the introduction of predictive performance measures, revealing 'gaps' in aged care practice, and the need for improvements. These included staff-identified strategies, changes in practice, gaps in aged care practice, areas for improvement, and the need for improvement plans, which prompted changes in staff behaviours and better care for residents.
Conclusions:
The study highlights the value and adaptability of using the most significant change methodology to evaluate complex interventions. This method enriches analysis by emphasising individual experiences, and the dynamics of organisational change. It highlighted subtle changes in aged care practice that would have been difficult to measure including staff behaviour, organisational culture, and the role of leadership in improving care quality for residents.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...

