Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A complex-cell receptive-field model.

H Spitzer, S Hochstein

    Journal of Neurophysiology
    |May 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study models cortical receptive fields, revealing how their spatial summation changes with spatial frequency. The model predicts three distinct response patterns to visual stimuli, aiding in understanding neuronal processing.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The ASACUSA antihydrogen and hydrogen program: results and prospects.

    Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2018
    Same author

    On the implications of bistability of visual pigment systems.

    Biophysics of structure and mechanism·2012
    Same author

    Properties of the on-transient of the intracellular response in the barnacle photoreceptor.

    Biophysics of structure and mechanism·2012
    Same author

    Transduction in photoreceptors: determination of the pigment transition or state coupled to excitation.

    Biophysics of structure and mechanism·2012
    Same author

    Protein depletion in pregnancy toxemia.

    Western journal of surgery, obstetrics, and gynecology·2010
    Same author

    Silica gel for the preservation of plant material.

    The Australian journal of science·2010
    Same journal

    Comprehensive Analysis of Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses using Fiber-Specific Modeling.

    Journal of neurophysiology·2026
    Same journal

    HCN channels modulate the medium afterhyperpolarization and adjust the firing gain of fast alpha motoneurons in mice.

    Journal of neurophysiology·2026
    Same journal

    Targeting intracranial electrical stimulation to network regions defined within individuals causes network-level effects.

    Journal of neurophysiology·2026
    Same journal

    When "Noise" Isn't Simply Noise: Deterministic Postural Drive During Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (nGVS).

    Journal of neurophysiology·2026
    Same journal

    Abrupt Scene Onsets and Gradually Emerging Scene Information Produce Distinct EEG Decoding Dynamics.

    Journal of neurophysiology·2026
    Same journal

    From discovery to translation: charting a course for the <i>Journal of Neurophysiology</i>.

    Journal of neurophysiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Computational Neuroscience
    • Visual Processing

    Background:

    • Cortical neuron responses to visual stimuli vary with stimulation parameters.
    • Receptive field properties, including spatial summation, can change with spatial frequency.
    • Previous work demonstrated single or double-peaked response histograms and spatial-phase dependence.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze a model receptive field exhibiting variable spatial summation.
    • To test a model incorporating nonlinear summation between subunits.
    • To compare model predictions with experimental data on cortical complex-cell responses.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a model receptive field with two rows of difference-of-Gaussians (DOG) subunits.
    • Introduced a half-wave rectification stage before pooling to simulate nonlinear summation.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed predicted responses to counterphase-grating stimulation and compared with experimental data.

    • Main Results:

    • The model predicts three response forms (single-peaked, double-peaked, mixed) based on spatial frequency and phase.
    • Response amplitude dependence on spatial phase varies from sinusoidal to full-wave rectified sinusoidal.
    • Null responses are predicted only for specific spatial frequencies and phases.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed model provides a working hypothesis for analyzing cortical receptive field types.
    • Nonlinear summation between subunits is crucial for explaining observed response variations.
    • The model successfully predicts diverse response patterns observed in cortical neurons.