Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

Laparoscopic Splenectomy with Pericardial Devascularization for Hypersplenism and Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage Due to Portal Hypertension
Published on: November 15, 2024
Clinical impact of endoscopy in severely thrombocytopenic patients with hematologic malignancy experiencing
Badr Alhumayyd1, Ashton Naumann2, Amanda Cashen3
1Department of Gastroenterology, King Saud University, Riyadh 22480, Ar-Riyāḍ, Saudi Arabia. balhumayyd@gmail.com.
Background:
Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a major cause of hospitalization worldwide. Patients with hematologic malignancies have a higher risk of GIB as a result of thrombocytopenia and platelet dysfunction. There is no consensus on the optimal platelet level that would be safe for endoscopic intervention, although a platelet level of > 50 × 109 / L was suggested based on expert opinion. There is a paucity of data on whether endoscopic intervention and the timing of endoscopy impacted the outcome of patients with hematologic malignancy and severe thrombocytopenia who experienced acute overt GIB.
Aim:
To assess the safety of endoscopic intervention of inpatients with hematological malignancies and severe thrombocytopenia presenting with acute overt GIB.
Methods:
This is a single center retrospective study. The data was collected from the electronic health record from 2018 to 2020. Inpatients with hematologic malignancy who presented with acute overt GIB and platelet count ≤ 50 × 109/L were included in the study. Outcomes included mortality, transfusion requirements, length of stay, intensive care unit admission and recurrent bleeding. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare the outcomes of urgent endoscopy within 24 hours of GIB vs endoscopy > 24 hours.
Results:
A total of 76 patients were identified. The mean platelet count is 24.3 in the endoscopy arm and 14.6 in the conservative management arm. There was no statistically significant difference between patients who had endoscopy vs conservative management in 30-day (P = 0.13) or 1 year (P = 0.78) mortality, recurrent bleeding (P = 0.68), transfusion of red blood cells (P = 0.47), platelets (P = 0.31), or length of stay (P = 0.94). A subgroup analysis comparing urgent endoscopy within 24 hours compared with delayed endoscopy showed urgent endoscopy was not associated with improved 30-day or 1 year mortality (P = 0.11 and 0.46, respectively) compared to routine endoscopy, but was associated with decreased recurrent bleeding in 30 days (P = 0.01).
Conclusion:
Medical supportive treatment without endoscopy could be considered as an alternative to endoscopic therapy for patients with hematologic malignancy complicated by severe thrombocytopenia and acute non-variceal GIB.
More Related Videos
09:50Induction of Intestinal Graft-versus-host Disease and Its Mini-endoscopic Assessment in Live Mice
Published on: February 11, 2019
09:42Murine Endoscopy for In Vivo Multimodal Imaging of Carcinogenesis and Assessment of Intestinal Wound Healing and Inflammation
Published on: August 26, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Inflammatory Bowel Disease I: Ulcerative Colitis
Inflammatory bowel disease, or IBD, encompasses a group of disorders characterized by chronic inflammation or ulceration of the gastrointestinal tract.
Risk Factors
The exact cause of IBD remains unclear, although it is believed to be due to a mix of genetic, environmental, microbial, and immune factors. Genetic factors are significant in determining susceptibility to IBD, with family history being a critical risk factor. Individuals with a first-degree relative who has IBD are at...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations: