Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

The use of Biofeedback in Clinical Virtual Reality: The INTREPID Project
Published on: November 12, 2009
Does pregabalin offer potential as a first-line therapy for generalized anxiety disorder? A meta-analysis of
Narcis Cardoner1,2,3,4, Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas5,6, Pilar Saiz7,8,9,10,11
1Psychiatry Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Introduction:
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) is a mental health condition with a recent increase in prevalence. GAD is often underdiagnosed, leading to negative consequences for individuals, healthcare systems, and society. The economic burden and impaired quality of life associated with GAD underscores the need for effective treatment. Pregabalin has shown promise in reducing anxiety symptoms; however, further research is needed to evaluate its efficacy and compare it with other treatment options. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and optimal pregabalin dosage for the treatment of GAD.
Methods:
This meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Pregabalin-treated patients comprised the intervention group, whereas the comparator group received benzodiazepines, SSRIs, SNRIs, or placebo. Efficacy and safety were evaluated using various scales and adverse events (AEs). Randomized clinical trials were included in the study. Four major databases were used for this study. Outcome measures included the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I), discontinuation rates, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software, employing odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed based on follow-up and dosage.
Results:
Fourteen studies involving 4,822 patients were analyzed. Pregabalin demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing HAM-A global scores at 2 weeks (MD -1.23, 95% CI -1.79 to -0.66), 4 weeks (MD -1.12, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.63), 8 weeks (MD -2.50, 95% CI -4.21 to -0.79), 12 weeks (MD 0.99, 95% CI 0.35-1.63), and 6 months to 1 year (MD -3.31, 95% CI -4.30 to -2.31). Pregabalin also showed a higher response rate to HAM-A (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31 1.75). CGI-I scores favored pregabalin (MD -0.25, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.12), with a higher response rate (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15-1.55). The discontinuation rates were lower with pregabalin (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70, 0.91). Adverse events favored pregabalin over SSRIs/SNRIs and benzodiazepines at different doses. Pregabalin was associated with higher cost-effectiveness (MD 0.02, 95% CI 0.01, 0.03).
Conclusion:
Pregabalin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for generalized anxiety disorder, showing superior efficacy and safety compared with first-line medications.
Systematic Review Registration:
PROSPERO CRD42024556152.
More Related Videos
11:18Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
Published on: September 12, 2014
05:42Elevated Plus Maze Test Combined with Video Tracking Software to Investigate the Anxiolytic Effect of Exogenous Ketogenic Supplements
Published on: January 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Anxiolytic Drugs: Benzodiazepines and Buspirone
Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Anxiolytic Drugs: Overview
Primary Types of Anxiolytic Drugs
1. Benzodiazepines:
Benzodiazepines bind to the GABA-A receptor in the brain, enhancing GABA's interaction. This action reduces neurotransmission, effectively blocking anxiety-associated limbic...
Antiepileptic Drugs: GABAergic Pathway Potentiators
The key GABA pathway potentiators used in epilepsy management are as follows.
Benzodiazepines are a well-known class of drugs used for...
Antiepileptic Drugs: Potassium Channel Activators
Ezogabine has gained approval as an adjunctive treatment...
Anxiety: Overview
Individuals with anxiety often experience a range of physical and emotional symptoms, including sweating, trembling, tachycardia, and disturbances in sleep patterns. These symptoms vary in intensity and frequency but are generally disruptive and distressing.