Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
Published on: January 31, 2014
Exploring optimal in situ fabrication conditions to realize core-shell CsPbBr3 QDs with high PLQYs and structural
Dokyum Kim1, Soogeun Kim1, Sang-Youp Yim1
1Advanced Photonics Research Institute (APRI), Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju 61005, Republic of Korea. vsepr@gist.ac.kr.
Abstract:
Core-shell CsPbBr3 QDs (core-shell M-CsPbBr3 QDs) with high structural stability and excellent optical properties were developed through dual-defect passivation, with simultaneous application of in situ thiol ligand passivation and a core-shell structure using SiO2 as a shell. When MPTES was injected immediately before Cs-oleate injection, the formation of by-products (PbS and trigonal-Cs4PbBr6 nanocrystals) was suppressed/minimized and effective surface defect passivation was achieved, resulting in defect-less core-shell M-CsPbBr3 QDs. The thiol group of MPTES effectively passivated uncoordinated Pb2+ defects, while the SiO2 shell formed by the hydrolysis reaction of three silyl ethers inhibited the formation of defects (vacancies) by preventing the penetration of moisture. The core-shell M-CsPbBr3 QDs exhibited a PLQY of ∼82.9 ± 3.8%, much higher than that of pristine CsPbBr3 QDs (∼65.3 ± 3.8%). Furthermore, they also showed more than 5 times higher structural stability in DI water compared to pristine CsPbBr3 QDs. These results demonstrated that the synergistic effect of surface passivation with the thiol group and the core-shell structure can significantly improve the PLQYs and structural stability of CsPbBr3 QDs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Arousal Theory
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
The Availability Heuristic
Factorial Design

