Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Slice Patch Clamp Technique for Analyzing Learning-Induced Plasticity
Published on: November 11, 2017
The Suprapyramidal and Infrapyramidal Blades of the Dentate Gyrus Exhibit Different GluN Subunit Content and
Christina Strauch1, Juliane Böge1, Olena Shchyglo1
1Department of Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Abstract:
The entorhinal cortex sends afferent information to the hippocampus by means of the perforant path (PP). The PP input to the dentate gyrus (DG) terminates in the suprapyramidal (sDG) and infrapyramidal (iDG) blades. Different electrophysiological stimulation patterns of the PP can generate hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Whether frequency-dependent synaptic plasticity differs in the sDG and iDG is unclear. Here, we compared medial PP-DG responses in freely behaving adult rats and found that synaptic plasticity in the sDG is broadly frequency dependent, whereby long-term depression (LTD, > 24 h) is induced with stimulation at 1 Hz, short-term depression (< 2 h) is triggered by 5 or 10 Hz, and long-term potentiation (LTP) of increasing magnitudes is induced by 200 and 400 Hz stimulation, respectively. By contrast, although the iDG expresses STD following 5 or 10 Hz stimulation, LTD induced by 1 Hz is weaker, LTP is not induced by 200 Hz and LTP induced by 400 Hz stimulation is significantly smaller in magnitude than LTP induced in sDG. Furthermore, the stimulus-response relationship of iDG is suppressed compared to sDG. These differences may arise from differences in granule cell properties, or the complement of NMDA receptors. Patch clamp recordings, in vitro, revealed reduced firing frequencies in response to high currents, and different action potential thresholds in iDG compared to sDG. Assessment of the expression of GluN subunits revealed significantly lower expression levels of GluN1, GluN2A, and GluN2B in the middle molecular layer of iDG compared to sDG. Taken together, these data indicate that synaptic plasticity in the iDG is weaker, less persistent and less responsive to afferent frequencies than synaptic plasticity in sDG. Effects may be mediated by weaker NMDA receptor expression and differences in neuronal responses in iDG versus sDG. These characteristics may explain reported differences in experience-dependent information processing in the suprapyramidal and infrapyramidal blades of the DG.
More Related Videos
09:51Recording Synaptic Plasticity in Acute Hippocampal Slices Maintained in a Small-volume Recycling-, Perfusion-, and Submersion-type Chamber System
Published on: January 1, 2018
07:00Author Spotlight: Investigating Neural Activity of Dentate Gyrus Granule Cells with Miniature Microscope
Published on: August 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Protein and Protein Structure
A protein's shape is critical to its function. For example, an enzyme can...
Notch Signaling Pathway
The Notch gene came into the limelight in 1914 after the discovery that its mutation in Drosophila melanogaster leads to a serrated (or "notched") wing margin phenotype. It was not until 1985...
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
Transducer Mechanism: G Protein–Coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or...