Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

Automated Visual Cognitive Tasks for Recording Neural Activity Using a Floor Projection Maze
Published on: February 20, 2014
HPRS: hierarchical potential-based reward shaping from task specifications
Luigi Berducci1, Edgar A Aguilar2, Dejan Ničković2
1Cyber-Physical Systems Group, Computer Engineering, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract:
The automatic synthesis of policies for robotics systems through reinforcement learning relies upon, and is intimately guided by, a reward signal. Consequently, this signal should faithfully reflect the designer's intentions, which are often expressed as a collection of high-level requirements. Several works have been developing automated reward definitions from formal requirements, but they show limitations in producing a signal which is both effective in training and able to fulfill multiple heterogeneous requirements. In this paper, we define a task as a partially ordered set of safety, target, and comfort requirements and introduce an automated methodology to enforce a natural order among requirements into the reward signal. We perform this by automatically translating the requirements into a sum of safety, target, and comfort rewards, where the target reward is a function of the safety reward and the comfort reward is a function of the safety and target rewards. Using a potential-based formulation, we enhance sparse to dense rewards and formally prove this to maintain policy optimality. We call our novel approach hierarchical, potential-based reward shaping (HPRS). Our experiments on eight robotics benchmarks demonstrate that HPRS is able to generate policies satisfying complex hierarchical requirements. Moreover, compared with the state of the art, HPRS achieves faster convergence and superior performance with respect to the rank-preserving policy-assessment metric. By automatically balancing competing requirements, HPRS produces task-satisfying policies with improved comfort and without manual parameter tuning. Through ablation studies, we analyze the impact of individual requirement classes on emergent behavior. Our experiments show that HPRS benefits from comfort requirements when aligned with the target and safety and ignores them when in conflict with the safety or target requirements. Finally, we validate the practical usability of HPRS in real-world robotics applications, including two sim-to-real experiments using F1TENTH vehicles. These experiments show that a hierarchical design of task specifications facilitates the sim-to-real transfer without any domain adaptation.
Related Concept Videos
Role of Shaping in Operant Conditioning
The steps involved in shaping begin with reinforcing any response that resembles the desired behavior. For example, parents might praise a child for picking up one toy. As...
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...
Graded Potential
Graded potentials fall into two categories: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing. Depolarizing graded potentials typically occur when sodium (Na+) or...
Reinforcement
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...

