Clinical and metabolic profiles in behavioural frontotemporal dementia: Impact of age at onset
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
Published on: June 3, 2020
Mattia Losa1, Sara Garbarino2, Alessio Cirone2
1Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Aim:
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder, with considerable variability of age-at-onset. We explored clinical and metabolic differences between early- and late-onset behavioural FTD (bvFTD), assuming that they might represent different disease phenotypes.
Materials And Methods:
We retrospectively studied consecutive patients diagnosed with prodromal or overt bvFTD with [18F]FDG PET scan, neuropsychological assessment (NPS), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) available at baseline. Patients were divided into three groups based on age-at-onset: early onset-bvFTD (EO-bvFTD, age<70), late onset-bvFTD (LO-bvFTD, age 70-75) and very late onset-bvFTD (vLO-bvFTD, age>75). NPS and NPI were compared between groups and in the subset of prodromal patients, to study different syndromic phenotypes. Voxel-based analysis compared brain [18F]FDG PET of EO-bvFTD, LO-bvFTD and vLO-bvFTD independently, with respect to healthy controls, to explore metabolic differences. An inter-regional metabolic covariance analysis was performed in frontal lobe subregions, to explore differences in brain connectivity. Moreover, we supported our result using a correlation-based approach on clinical and metabolic variables.
Results:
101 bvFTD (62 prodromal bvFTD) were enrolled (EO-bvFTD: n = 36, prodromal n = 21; LO-bvFTD: n = 36, prodromal: n = 22; vLO-bvFTD: n = 29, prodromal: n = 19). Greater verbal memory deficit was evident in LO-bvFTD and vLO-bvFTD compared to EO-bvFTD (immediate recall: p = .018; p = .024; delayed recall: both p = .001, respectively), with similar results in the subset of prodromal patients. EO-bvFTD and LO-bvFTD had a higher behavioural severity than vLO-bvFTD. LO-bvFTD and vLO-bvFTD showed more widespread relative hypometabolism, with a greater involvement of posterior, subcortical and temporo-limbic regions compared with EO-bvFTD. Moreover, vLO-bvFTD showed a different pattern of intrafrontal metabolic covariance compared to EO-bvFTD and LO-bvFTD.
Discussion:
The cognitive-behavioural profile of bvFTD differs between early- and late-onset, already from the prodromal stage of the disease. Both metabolic pattern and functional connectivity vary based on age-at-onset. Understanding these differences could contribute to improve diagnostic accuracy and understanding the underling pathological heterogeneity.
More Related Videos
08:29Symmetric Bihemispheric Postmortem Brain Cutting to Study Healthy and Pathological Brain Conditions in Humans
Published on: December 18, 2016
06:23The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: October 13, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Dementia
The progression of dementia is generally gradual....
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Cognitive Development During Adulthood