Pacemaker Versus Defibrillator Therapy in Patients Eligible for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy: Evidence from the
Philipp S Lange1,2, Gerrit Frommeyer1, Thomas Kleemann2
1Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|February 26, 2025
Summary
Most patients receive cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D). CRT-P selection is linked to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, but CRT-P shows higher mortality in ischemic cases compared to CRT-D.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is guideline-recommended for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block.
- The choice between CRT with a pacemaker (CRT-P) and CRT with a defibrillator (CRT-D) is debated, with registry data suggesting higher mortality with CRT-P.
- This study investigates the clinical factors influencing CRT-P vs. CRT-D selection and their comparative outcomes in a real-world setting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clinical determinants for selecting CRT-P versus CRT-D in patients eligible for CRT.
- To compare the one-year clinical outcomes of CRT-P and CRT-D therapies using large, multi-center registry data.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the German Device Registry (DEVICE), a prospective, nationwide registry of 5451 patients with device implantations.
- Focus on 1603 patients who received cardiac resynchronization therapy, comparing CRT-P (n=67) and CRT-D (n=1536) groups.
- One-year follow-up data were used to assess mortality and clinical characteristics.
Main Results:
- The majority of CRT patients (95.8%) received CRT-D. CRT-P patients had better baseline left ventricular systolic function and less history of myocardial infarction.
- Preexisting pacemakers and history of stroke/peripheral embolism were key determinants for CRT-P selection.
- Overall one-year mortality was 8.0%. In ischemic cardiomyopathy, CRT-P was associated with significantly higher mortality (21.2%) than CRT-D (8.9%). No significant difference was observed in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Conclusions:
- Most patients undergoing CRT receive a CRT-D system.
- CRT-P is more frequently selected for patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and those with a prior pacemaker.
- Treatment outcomes differ significantly between CRT-P and CRT-D, particularly in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, where CRT-D appears superior.
Keywords:
German device registryICD implantationcardiac resynchronization therapycardiovascular mortality

