Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

07:14
Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
Published on: May 24, 2022
4.3K
Comparative Study of Two Root Coverage Procedures for Localized Gingival Recessions on Lower Anterior Teeth Using
Min-Young Goo1, Seung-Kyu Lee1, Kyung-Min Kim1
1Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
|February 26, 2025
Summary
This study compared two root coverage techniques for gingival recession using partially de-epithelialized connective tissue grafts (PE-CTG). Both techniques showed high root coverage and increased keratinized tissue, with no significant differences between them.
Area of Science:
- Periodontology
- Oral Surgery
- Regenerative Dentistry
Background:
- Gingival recession is a common condition causing aesthetic and functional issues.
- Effective root coverage techniques are crucial for treating gingival recession.
- Partially de-epithelialized connective tissue graft (PE-CTG) is a promising material for root coverage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of two recipient site preparation techniques for PE-CTG in treating localized gingival recession on lower anterior teeth.
- To evaluate root coverage and keratinized tissue gain following the two surgical approaches.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective case series involving 18 patients (20 teeth) with lower anterior tooth recession.
- Two groups: tPECTG (supraperiosteal tunneling) and vPECTG (vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access).
- PE-CTG harvested from the hard palate; root coverage and keratinized tissue (KT) measured pre- and post-surgery (6 months).
Main Results:
- Mean root coverage was 89.01% overall (tPECTG: 87.85%, vPECTG: 89.78%).
- Average KT gain was 3.48 mm (tPECTG: 3.94 mm, vPECTG: 3.17 mm).
- No statistically significant differences were observed between the tPECTG and vPECTG groups for root coverage or KT gain (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Both tPECTG and vPECTG techniques are effective for root coverage and increasing keratinized gingival width.
- The vPECTG technique may be easier to perform than tPECTG.
- Both methods maintained the mucogingival junction and increased keratinized gingival width.

