Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

442
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
442
Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

11.8K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
11.8K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

382
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
382
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity01:24

Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity

334
A stroke engine has a slider-crank mechanism that converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider.
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
334
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

320
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
320

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Active-Passive Vibration Control of Cantilever Beam Based on Magnetic Spring with Negative Stiffness and Piezoelectric Actuator.

Micromachines·2025
Same author

An Active Vibration Isolation and Compensation System for Improving Optical Image Quality: Modeling and Experiment.

Micromachines·2023
Same author

Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting from Suspension Structures with Piezoelectric Layers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2025

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study
07:51

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study

Published on: March 14, 2017

16.7K

Analysis of Kinect-Based Human Motion Capture Accuracy Using Skeletal Cosine Similarity Metrics.

Wenchuan Jia1, Hanyang Wang1, Qi Chen1

  • 1School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Azure Kinect motion capture accuracy was evaluated using a marker-based system. Performance depends on distance, orientation, and self-occlusion, offering insights for improved human motion recognition applications.

Keywords:
Azure Kinect DKbody posturecosine similaritymotion capturerecognition accuracy

More Related Videos

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

1.5K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2025

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study
07:51

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study

Published on: March 14, 2017

16.7K
Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

1.5K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Robotics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Kinect's human motion capture is vital for rehabilitation and robot control.
  • Assessing Azure Kinect's accuracy is crucial to prevent errors in real-world applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate Azure Kinect's human pose estimation accuracy.
  • To identify factors influencing motion capture fidelity.
  • To provide recommendations for optimal Kinect deployment.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a high-precision, marker-based motion capture system for ground truth data.
  • Assessed Azure Kinect performance on static and dynamic human movements.
  • Employed cosine similarity for skeletal representation to measure pose accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Subject distance, orientation, and self-occlusion significantly impact Azure Kinect's recognition fidelity.
  • Observed trends informed optimal testing conditions and potential performance optimizations.
  • Cosine similarity analysis revealed application-centric accuracy metrics.

Conclusions:

  • Azure Kinect's motion capture accuracy is influenced by environmental and subject-specific factors.
  • Findings offer practical insights for deploying Kinect in high-precision motion recognition tasks.
  • Further analysis suggests potential for performance enhancement under specific configurations.