Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
Development and measurement properties of the adolescent-reported CBBDQ12-18
Marieke L van Engelenburg-van Lonkhuyzen1, Esther M J Bols2, Caroline H G Bastiaenen1
1Department of Epidemiology, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Introduction:
Previously, the parent-reported Childhood Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction Questionnaire (CBBDQ) for children aged 5-12 years was found valid, reliable and responsive. The purpose of this study was to adapt the CBBDQ to construct the adolescent-reported CBBDQ12-18, translate it into English according to guidelines, and determine its measurement properties, as defined by the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).
Methods:
Delphi panels, surveys on feasibility and acceptability, English translation and cross-cultural adaptation, and a prospective cohort study were conducted. Participants were adolescents, 12-18 years with and without bladder or bowel dysfunctions, and healthcare professionals who were experts in the field. The Medical Ethics Committee of Maastricht University approved the study (MEC 2018-0321).
Results:
A total of 107 adolescents and 15 professionals participated from February 2017 to August 2023. The CBBDQ12-18 was feasible and acceptable, translated into English and cross-culturally adapted. Content validity, moderate construct and fair criterion validity and excellent test-retest reliability with acceptable internal consistencies were demonstrated. Responsiveness at 6 months could not be demonstrated.
Discussion:
The CBBDQ12-18 is a symptom questionnaire on bladder and bowel problems in adolescents 12-18 years. It was developed in close cooperation with adolescents (some of them bilingual) and experienced healthcare workers. The outcomes regarding the measurement properties of the CBBDQ12-18 were lower than those for the CBBDQ, but remained satisfactory, except responsiveness. A possible limitation of the present cohort study may be its sample sizes, although the total sample sizes of this study were sufficient in line with COSMIN guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Conduct Disorder

