Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of Effective Dose From Intraoperative 3D Imaging Using Mobile and Fixed C-Arms Versus Computed Tomography When Evaluating the Lumbar Spine.

Global spine journal·2025
Same author

[Innovative 3D imaging].

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2023
Same author

[Distortion of the cervical spine : Pathophysiology, diagnostics, treatment and assessment].

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2022
Same author

Hernia Reduced by Distension.

Atlanta medical and surgical journal·2022
Same author

Hyperelastic parameter identification of human articular cartilage and substitute materials.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials·2022
Same author

Complex mechanical behavior of human articular cartilage and hydrogels for cartilage repair.

Acta biomaterialia·2020
Same journal

A Global Bibliometric and Science-Mapping Analysis of Robotic Organ Transplantation (2002-2025).

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
Same journal

Compliance Control of a Robotic Breast Ultrasound System Based on Variable Admittance Control.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
Same journal

Short-Term Outcomes of Upper-Dome Overlap Single-Flap Valvuloplasty Versus Kamikawa Anastomosis in Robotic Proximal Gastrectomy.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Admittance Control for Robotic Ultrasound Examination Based on a Breast Biomechanical Model.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
Same journal

Robotic Choledochal Cyst Excision With Intracorporeal Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy in Adolescent and Adult Patients: Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
Same journal

Short-Term Outcomes and Quality of Life After Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Double-Flap Technique for Proximal Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2025

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

1.7K

Automated Digital Image Optimisation in Intraoperative 2D and 3D Imaging Using a Mobile C-Arm With Flat-Panel

J Groh1, M Perl1, L Bräuer2

  • 1Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery : MRCAS
|February 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Automated assistance tools significantly reduce intraoperative imaging time and improve 3D image assessment. These tools enhance surgical efficiency by simplifying image acquisition and optimizing contrast and brightness settings.

Keywords:
MARScrewScoutSpotAdaptautomated image analysisintraoperative imagingmetal artifact reduction

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

755
Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization
09:49

Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization

Published on: December 2, 2013

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2025

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

1.7K
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

755
Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization
09:49

Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization

Published on: December 2, 2013

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Surgical Technology

Background:

  • Intraoperative imaging requires significant effort for acquisition and assessment.
  • Current 2D and 3D imaging techniques can be time-consuming and complex.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate automated assistance tools for intraoperative 2D and 3D imaging.
  • To assess the impact of these tools on acquisition effort and image assessment quality.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of ScrewScout function for pedicle screw assessment.
  • Assessment of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm.
  • Analysis of a tool for simplified image contrast and brightness settings.

Main Results:

  • Automated assistance reduced imaging time from 83s to 22s (p=0.003).
  • MAR improved image quality, with benefits decreasing with experience.
  • Image acquisition parameter setting time decreased from 140s to 61s (p=0.05).

Conclusions:

  • Automated assistance tools offer practical support in the intraoperative setting.
  • These tools can enhance efficiency and potentially improve image quality during surgery.