Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
Published on: September 2, 2020
New strategies for non-targeted quantification in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: The potential of
Jason Devers1, David I Pattison1, Asger B Hansen1
1Analytical Chemistry Group, Department of Plant and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Abstract:
Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) offers unrivaled peak capacity and the ability to resolve and characterize hundreds to thousands of compounds within complex environmental samples. Knowledge of their concentrations is essential in assessing their toxicological and regulatory relevance; however, reliable quantification typically requires concurrent analysis of an authentic standard for each compound. Response factors (RF) may be used to estimate the concentration of a compound without the need for its respective standard, but this is not routinely employed in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). This study demonstrates that GC × GC offers a new opportunity for the calculation of RFs and estimating a compounds concentration via the creation of 2D total ion current (TIC) response factor surfaces (RFS). A new method, linking a compounds retention time coordinate to its RF using a reconstructed TIC approach, was used to calculate the concentration of 27 compounds in both solvent and effluent wastewater matrix. Using both suspect screening and non-targeted methodologies, average fold change errors of 1.58 and 1.83 respectively were determined for the novel RFS approach. The approach was compared to an RF prediction model utilizing molecular descriptors, using a genetic algorithm, partial least squares regression (GA-PLS) model. The accuracy of the RFS method demonstrates its potential in the fields of suspect screening and non-targeted analysis, where realistic concentration estimates are required. The RFS approach delivers comparable accuracy in concentration prediction compared to computational approaches for determining RFs, but crucially, without the need for generating molecular descriptors or acquiring a reference standard. Additionally, a purely non-targeted approach outlined can allow for the calculation of RF for features without the need for identification or a reference spectrum.
More Related Videos
07:57Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
Published on: July 25, 2014
11:44Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 6, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
Gas Chromatography: Introduction
In GC, a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...