Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

870
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
870
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

1.9K
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
1.9K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

79
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
79
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

790
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
790
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

123
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
123
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Application of the Population Health Institute Model of Health for Identifying Cancer Catchment Area Priorities.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2026
Same author

Exploring Community Health in the 2020s: Updates to the County Health Rankings Model, Methods, and Tools.

Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP·2026
Same author

Why Building Power Is Key to Protecting Academic Public Health and Advancing Health Equity.

American journal of public health·2025
Same author

Medicaid Expansion Among Nonelderly Adults and Cardiovascular Disease: Efficiency Vs. Equity.

The Milbank quarterly·2025
Same author

Cluster Analysis Methods to Support Population Health Improvement Among US Counties.

Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP·2024
Same author

Keeping It Political and Powerful: Defining the Structural Determinants of Health.

The Milbank quarterly·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.7K

Centering Equity in Evidence-Informed Decision Making: Theoretical and Practical Considerations.

Bomi Kim Hirsch1, Kiersten Frobom1, Gillian Giglierano1

  • 1University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

The Milbank Quarterly
|February 28, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Population health research needs a unified method to assess intervention equity. Guiding principles include historical context, intervention design, differential impacts, and community context for evidence-based decision-making to promote health equity.

Keywords:
equity assessmentevidence‐informed decision makinghealth equity

More Related Videos

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.4K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.7K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.4K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Population health research
  • Health equity assessment
  • Intervention impact evaluation

Background:

  • Addressing health disparities requires robust evaluation of interventions.
  • Current evidence synthesis for intervention equity is often fragmented.
  • A standardized approach is needed to guide policy and practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a synthesized approach for evaluating intervention impact on health equity.
  • To outline key areas for equity assessment when empirical data is limited.
  • To inform evidence-based decision-making for advancing health equity.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing theoretical frameworks and policy analysis.
  • Identifying four critical areas for equity assessment: historical context, intervention design, differential impact/intersectionality, and community context.
  • Synthesizing existing knowledge to guide practical application.

Main Results:

  • A structured, four-component framework for equity assessment is proposed.
  • The framework emphasizes understanding root causes, beneficiaries, differential effects, and community specificities.
  • This approach provides a guide for practitioners and policymakers.

Conclusions:

  • A synthesized equity assessment approach is crucial for population health research.
  • This framework enhances the ability to make evidence-based decisions that promote health equity.
  • Integrating equity considerations proactively leads to more effective and just interventions.