Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2025

Design, Fabrication, and Administration of the Hand Active Sensation Test HASTe
Published on: September 8, 2015
H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores for heart failure risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients
Yi-Peng Gao1, Hong-Yun Liu1, Xiao-Jun Bi1
1Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Aims:
H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores have demonstrated prognostic value in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction. This study aimed to explore the value of the H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores for HF risk stratification in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
Methods And Results:
In this cohort study, 1068 HCM patients were included. Then the H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores were calculated to categorize patients into low, intermediate, and high score groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of the first HF hospitalization and all-cause death. 594 (55.6%) patients were classified discordantly. After a follow-up period of 3.1 ± 2.1 years, 85 (8.0%) patients were admitted for HF for the first time, and 62 (5.8%) patients died. Rates of first HF hospitalization and all-cause death per 1000 person-years for the low, intermediate, and high H2FPEF score groups were 25.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.5-35.4), 52.0 (95% CI: 41.6-62.3), and 148.1 (95% CI: 77.7-218.5), respectively. For the low-intermediate and high HFA-PEFF score groups, rates were 19.3 (95% CI: 11.6-27.0) and 69.3 (95% CI: 56.4-82.1), respectively. Intermediate H2FPEF score (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.820, 95% CI: 1.135-2.919; P = 0.013), high H2FPEF score (HR: 3.464, 95% CI: 1.774-6.765; P < 0.001), and high HFA-PEFF score (HR: 2.414, 95% CI: 1.501-3.882; P < 0.001) were each independently associated with an increased risk of the primary endpoint. Intermediate-high H2FPEF score demonstrated an equal risk for the primary endpoint compared to the high HFA-PEFF score (HR: 0.826, 95% CI: 0.636-1.072; P > 0.05). Obesity (HR: 1.958, 95% CI: 1.140-3.363; P = 0.015), atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.686, 95% CI: 1.071-2.654; P = 0.024), pulmonary hypertension (HR: 1.613, 95% CI: 1.032-2.521; P = 0.036) of the H2FPEF score, and the morphological major criterion (HR: 1.601, 95% CI: 1.084-2.364; P = 0.018) and functional major criterion (HR: 2.340, 95% CI: 1.442-3.797; P < 0.001) of the HFA-PEFF score were independent predictors of the primary endpoint. A new algorithm was constructed using the independent predictors from both scores, with the functional major criterion weighted as 2 points and the others as 1 point. The H2FPEF score, HFA-PEFF score, and the new algorithm demonstrated C-indices of 0.594, 0.651, and 0.681, respectively.
Conclusions:
There is discordance in the classification of patients with HCM using the H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores. Both scores demonstrated prognostic value in risk stratification for HF hospitalization and all-cause death in HCM patients. Future studies should develop and validate a new algorithm integrating both scores.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hess's Law
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Hooke's Law
Generalized Hooke's Law
Hemoglobin
When all four heme groups are bound to oxygen, the resulting molecule is called oxyhemoglobin. As a result, arterial blood...
Enthalpy

